We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

Protecting your investments in foreign courtsan australian mining company secures bilateral investment treaty remedy for local court delays

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, India
  • -
  • March 5 2012

Australian mining company White Industries Australia Limited (White) has successfully brought a claim under the Australia-India bilateral investment treaty (BIT) seeking a remedy following a nine year delay by India’s courts

International trade compliance - August 2012

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Argentina, Australia, Belarus, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, European Union, Global, Hong Kong, India, Iran, Ireland, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Myanmar, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Russia, Rwanda, South Africa, Switzerland, Syria, Ukraine, United Kingdom, USA, Vanuatu , Yemen
  • -
  • August 6 2012

Covering Customs and Other Import Requirements, Export Controls and Sanctions, Trade Remedies, WTO and Anti-Corruption

India held liable for failure to enforce an ICC arbitral award

  • Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
  • -
  • Australia, Global, India
  • -
  • April 20 2012

A recent investment treaty arbitration decision highlights the potential value of bilateral investment treaties in supporting the enforcement of international arbitral awards

White Industries Australia Limited v The Republic of India - India breaches AustralianIndian BIT

  • Squire Sanders
  • -
  • Australia, India
  • -
  • June 28 2012

On 30 November 2011, a final award was delivered by the UNCITRAL Tribunal in the bi-lateral investment treaty arbitration between White Industries Australia Limited (White Industries) and the Republic of India ( BIT Award