We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 5,090

Health care Qui Tam Update - recent developments & unsealed False Claims Act (FCA) cases - October 2014

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 16 2014

Between our last Qui Tam Update and the end of June, 65 health carerelated qui tam cases were unsealed (28 in April, 18 in May, and 19 in June

Supreme Court denies cert in prominent FCA cases

  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 16 2014

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in two Fourth Circuit FCA casesUnited States ex rel. Bunk v. Gosselin World Wide Moving, N.V

DOD finalizes amendments to DFARS regarding the storage, treatment, and disposal of non-DOD toxic and hazardous materials on DOD sites

  • Jenner & Block
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 16 2014

On September 30, 2014, the Department of Defense (DOD) published a final rule that amends Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS

Provider waives attorney-client privilege in qui tam case by asserting compliance with law

  • Ober Kaler
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2014

A federal district court recently rejected a health care provider's claim of attorney-client privilege and ordered the provider to produce written

Manufacturing and infrastructure: not just about economics our own security depends on it

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2014

The call for dramatic improvements in America's infrastructure as a critical driver in the reestablishment of the nation's manufacturing supremacy is

“Prior or pending litigation” exclusion bars coverage for litigation that was unknown to policyholder

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2014

Companies that do business with the federal government, or whose business transactions otherwise involve payments by the government, undoubtedly

Follow the rules, or don’t lose the money?

  • Duane Morris LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2014

What's more important: following public procurement rules, or making sure that federal funding won't disappear? That's the question being debated in

Segregating worktime for purposes of the "contractor minimum wage"

  • Fisher & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 14 2014

The U.S. Labor Department's voluminous final regulations "Establishing a Minimum Wage for Contractors" under Executive Order 13658 (about which we

Government gives health care companies more leverage in their negotiations with physicians

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 14 2014

Health care organizations that contract with physicians can face potential liability (including millions of dollars in civil, criminal, and

Court finds potential personal liability for a company’s import violations

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 14 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled in a new en banc decision that individuals employed by importers, or corporations that