We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 9,517

Most employers will continue to provide health coverage next year, survey finds

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 22 2013

The number of employers that plan to continue providing their employees with health insurance has increased, according to a new survey conducted by

Clearing up the rumors around health reform delays: what really happened, what won’t and steps employers and insurers can take now

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

Rumors are flying in health policy circles that the Obama Administration might delay implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Some worry

AIU Ins. Co. v. TIG Ins. Co., No. 07-7052, 2013 US Dist. LEXIS 41716 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2013)

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

In AIU Insurance Co. v. TIG Insurance Co., No. 07-7052, 2013 US Dist. LEXIS 41716 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2013), the US District Court for the Southern

ERISA litigation alert: check your plan subrogation and reimbursement language to eliminate “contractual gaps”

  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

In U.S. Airways v. McCutchen, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the ability of U.S. Airways' health plan to recover medical expenses that it previously

New “Notice of Exchange” requirement for employers

  • Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

As amended by the Affordable Care Act ("ACA"), the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") includes a new notice requirement for employers. The purpose of

California district court: no coverage for complaints against insured law firm alleging improper withholding of fees

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, applying California law, has granted an insurer's motion for summary

Eighth Circuit addresses business risk exclusions

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

In its recent decision in Spirtas Co. v. Nautilus Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 10031 (8th Cir. May 20, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals

Update on the exchanges: one-stop shopping for health insurance

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

Exchanges are designed to make insurance options much more understandable. Both public and private Exchanges follow the same four-step process:

Eighth Circuit affirms dismissal of contract dispute between insurer and reinsurance broker

  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

In a contract dispute between an insurer and its reinsurance broker on which we previously reported, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's

Fee exclusion deemed ambiguous

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, applying California law, reversed an order granting judgment on the pleadings to an insurer