Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 536

Franchisees who faked evidence in court case permitted to continue litigating

Armstrong Teasdale LLP
-
USA
-
May 15 2013

It should be obvious to anyone reading these words that it is never a good idea to lie to a court of law. That's a pretty basic concept, right? Lying

Reach of New Jersey Franchise Practices Act continues to expand

McCarter & English LLP
-
Jersey, USA
-
May 7 2013

On March 13, 2013, the United States District Court, District of New Jersey, in Strassle v. Bimbo Foods Bakeries Distrib., Inc., No. 12-3313 (Mar. 13

When are a franchisor's financial performance representations actionable?

Armstrong Teasdale LLP
-
USA
-
May 7 2013

Under the FTC's Franchise Rule, a franchisor is permitted, but not required, to answer that all-important question asked by would-be franchise

Plain language is important

Roetzel & Andress
-
USA
-
May 2 2013

In H&R Block Tax Services v. Franklin, the Court of Appeals concluded (over a strong dissent) that H&R Block had the right to terminate two franchise

Franchising bill moves forward in California

Armstrong Teasdale LLP
-
USA
-
May 1 2013

An update to my previous post regarding the "fair franchising bill" being considered in California's Senate: on Tuesday, April 16, 2013, the

Resistance to inclusion and maintenance of social media will destroy a brand

Roetzel & Andress
-
USA
-
April 25 2013

Competitive and successful franchises realize that the question is not whether or not to participate in a social media campaign, but rather how to

Oklahoma appellate court reverses finding of agency relationship between Ford Motor Company and dealer

Gray Plant Mooty
-
USA
-
April 23 2013

An Oklahoma appellate court rejected a trial court's decision that had found Ford Motor Company vicariously liable to disgruntled customers of a

Federal court holds manufacturer did not timely exercise right of first refusal

Gray Plant Mooty
-
USA
-
April 23 2013

A federal district court in Maryland recently determined that a manufacturer did not timely exercise its right of first refusal to purchase a truck

Minnesota Court of Appeals affirms dismissal of dealership’s unfair practices and pricing discrimination claims

Gray Plant Mooty
-
USA
-
April 23 2013

The Minnesota Court of Appeals recently affirmed rulings against a dealership which alleged violations of Minnesota distribution and dealership laws

New Hampshire Supreme Court holds settlement of termination dispute violates statute

Gray Plant Mooty
-
USA
-
April 23 2013

An agreement by which an automobile manufacturer and its dealer resolved a termination dispute violated New Hampshire's dealer protection statute

next >

Search results

Franchisees who faked evidence in court case permitted to continue litigating

Reach of New Jersey Franchise Practices Act continues to expand

When are a franchisor's financial performance representations actionable?

Plain language is important

Franchising bill moves forward in California

Resistance to inclusion and maintenance of social media will destroy a brand

Oklahoma appellate court reverses finding of agency relationship between Ford Motor Company and dealer

Federal court holds manufacturer did not timely exercise right of first refusal

Minnesota Court of Appeals affirms dismissal of dealership’s unfair practices and pricing discrimination claims

New Hampshire Supreme Court holds settlement of termination dispute violates statute

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea