We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 221,874

Is a LinkedIn contact list a trade secret? Potentially, yes.

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 26 2014

As a LinkedIn user, the decision concerning whether to share your entire list of connections with any individual connection can often implicate a

CBM review cannot proceed if petitioner filed civil suit challenging patent’s validity prior to filing review petition

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

Addressing the circumstances under which a Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review may proceed, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO

Supplemental information authorization hard to come by

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB, the Board) denied a motion by a petitioner to file a motion for supplemental information to introduce the

Don’t throw it away: a company may not have rights to confidential information it puts in the garbage

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

In an opinion that should remind us all of the importance of properly disposing of documents, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals upheld the

PTAB denies motion to amend a motion to amend; reason: delay

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

In response to patent owner’s request to file a motion to amend a motion to amend made approximately one month before oral hearing, the U.S. Patent

Counsel may confer with a witness between cross-examination and re-cross, but the witness might be re-crossed on the substance of such a discussion

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

In an order regarding allowable communications between counsel and witness, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) held that counsel may confer

Federal Circuit remands trio of attorneys’ fee award cases back to district courts

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

In the span of 10 days, and in the wake of the U.S Supreme Court decisions of last spring in Icon Health & Fitness, v. Octane Fitness(IP Update, Vol

Unincorporated associations can own and enforce trademark rights

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a grant of summary judgment and a permanent injunction in favor of a common law trademark

Broad language in specification can provide written description support

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

In reviving a patent owner’s patent infringement lawsuit, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a district court’s summary

Motions to amend hard to come by

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

In a Final Written Decision the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) found all instituted claims unpatentable and denied patent owner’s motion to