We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

The curious case of Indian arbitration

  • Norton Rose Canada LLP
  • -
  • India
  • -
  • October 6 2011

A recent decision of the Supreme Court of India emphasises the importance of proper drafting of arbitration agreements when contracting with a party from India or when the contract is governed by Indian law

Time to re-draft your arbitration agreements (again)?

  • Norton Rose Australia
  • -
  • India, United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 19 2012

Two significant decisions in India and England are cause to reconsider what needs to go into an arbitration agreement and what can be discarded: Bharat Aluminium Co v Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service Inc (Bharat) and Sulamerica CIA Nacional De Seguros SA v Enesa Engenharia SA 2012 EWCA Civ 638 (Sulamerica

India: investors beware

  • Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
  • -
  • India
  • -
  • July 18 2008

Foreign investors in India face a new challenge, following the Satyam Computer judgment

Enforcement of awards in India

  • Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
  • -
  • India
  • -
  • October 20 2009

India’s 1996 Arbitration & Conciliation Act aims to offer a real alternative to litigation but in practice is limited by continuing court interference at all stages including enforcement

Shashoua & Anor v Sharma

  • Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
  • -
  • India, United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 30 2010

In 2009 the High Court issued an anti-suit injunction restraining proceedings in the Indian courts challenging pre-existing interim arbitral awards