We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

Comparative advertising in Hungary

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • European Union, Hungary
  • -
  • June 27 2011

Comparative advertising is permitted by the Advertisement Act in Hungary

Likelihood of confusion of pharmaceutical trademarks in Hungary

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • Hungary
  • -
  • May 3 2011

Recently the Hungarian Supreme Court delivered the final judgement on a Hungarian trademark application opposed by a pharmaceutical company

"Real hungarian" issues on labeling, advertising

  • Schoenherr
  • -
  • Hungary
  • -
  • April 4 2011

The Hungarian Competition Authority initiated proceeding because certain supermarket chains allegedly mislead consumers by labeling and advertising certain products as "Real Hungarian"

E-filing at the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office

  • Schoenherr
  • -
  • Hungary
  • -
  • March 18 2011

The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO) extended its means of electronic communication as of 1 March 2011

CMS brands review

  • CMS
  • -
  • Belgium, European Union, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 12 2010

It has been well over a decade since the Trade Marks Directive came into force, approximating the law on trade marks across Europe

Requirement of genuine use of a Community trade mark the Hungarian Patent Office speaks out

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • Hungary
  • -
  • June 21 2010

The Hungarian Patent Office ("HPO") supported the decision of the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property ("BOIP") in the ONELOMEL opposition case, in which BOIP stated that the use of a Community trade mark in one single Member State does not qualify as genuine use