We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

Cybersquatting; typosquatting Facebook’s $2.8 million in damages and domain names

  • Francis Abourizk Lightowlers
  • -
  • Global, USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

A decision was recently handed down in California awarding Facebook $2.8 million in damages for domain name 'squatting'. The defendants in the

Apple, Inc. lost iPhone trademark in Brazil: can you save your company’s brands and trademarks from the same fate?

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • Brazil, Global, USA
  • -
  • February 14 2013

Apple, Inc. recently learned the Brazilian Trademark Office or the Instituto Nacional Da Propriedade Industrial, ruled in favor of a local company

New Tools for Arguing Against the Use of Hindsight and Common Sense in Obviousness Rejections

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • Global, USA
  • -
  • July 16 2012

In a victory for patent applicants and owners, a recent decision by the Federal Circuit re-emphasized the importance of the Graham factors to avoid the ever-present risk of using hindsight when making an obviousness determination, and questioned the all-too-familiar reliance on “common sense” to make obviousness arguments

WIPO refuses to order the transfer of worldcup2011.com to the International Rugby Board

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • Global
  • -
  • January 12 2012

In Rugby World Cup Ltd v Andreas Gyrre WIPO D2011-1520 (1 November 2011) sole panellist Robert Badgely dismissed the complaint by the International Rugby Board (IRB) against ticket reseller Euroteam AS on the basis that the domain name could not be considered confusingly similar to the IRB’s trade marks RUGBY WORLD CUP and RUGBY WORLD CUP 2011, essentially because the dominant term “rugby” was lacking in the domain name

Yourtrademarkhere.xxx: how your trademark could become associated with the adult entertainment industry

  • Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC
  • -
  • Global
  • -
  • July 1 2011

ICANN, the organization responsible for administering internet domain names, recently approved the .XXX top-level domain (TLD) for use by those in the adult entertainment industry

Later trade mark rights: risk of reverse domain name hijacking

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • Global
  • -
  • September 28 2010

A recent case decided under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) by a panel from the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) clearly underlines the fact that registration of a domain name must generally post-date the complainant's trade mark rights or the complaint will be denied