We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 30

The Global Employer: February 2013

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Argentina, China, Colombia, France, Global, Japan, Netherlands, Russia, Spain, Ukraine, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • February 20 2013

The Global Employer: Monthly eAlert is a publication by Baker & McKenzie's Global Employment & Labor Law group designed to keep our clients and

Trade disputes with Argentina lead to U.S., E.U., Japanese request for WTO panel

  • King & Spalding LLP
  • -
  • Argentina, European Union, Global, Japan, USA
  • -
  • January 1 2013

On December 6, 2012, the United States, the European Union, and Japan formally requested the establishment of a WTO panel to resolve their simmering trade

Argentine protectionism

  • King & Spalding LLP
  • -
  • Argentina, Global, Japan, USA
  • -
  • October 1 2012

On August 21, 2012, the United States and Japan both initiated complaints against Argentina at the WTO because of Argentina’s use of trade protectionist measures

International regulatory update 13-17 August 2012

  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • -
  • France, Global, Japan, Luxembourg, Slovakia, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • August 20 2012

The Financial Stability Board (FSB) is seeking views regarding the appropriate jurisdiction for the establishment of the Global LEI Foundation and Central Operating Unit of the global legal entity identifier (LEI) system

International trade compliance - August 2012

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Argentina, Australia, Belarus, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, European Union, Global, Hong Kong, India, Iran, Ireland, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Myanmar, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Russia, Rwanda, South Africa, Switzerland, Syria, Ukraine, United Kingdom, USA, Vanuatu , Yemen
  • -
  • August 6 2012

Covering Customs and Other Import Requirements, Export Controls and Sanctions, Trade Remedies, WTO and Anti-Corruption

WTO rare earth dispute resubmitted

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • China, European Union, Global, Japan, USA
  • -
  • July 15 2012

The European Union, Japan, and the United States placed July 13 a second request on the World Trade Organization’s July 23 Dispute Settlement Body agenda asking the organization to establish a dispute panel to rule whether China’s restrictions on rare earths exports violate global trade rules

A rock or an island? The significance of Okinotorishima and its status under the international law of the sea

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • China, Global, Japan, South Korea
  • -
  • July 5 2012

Okinotorishima is an atoll in the Philippine Sea

Short-lived pollutant coalition

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • Colombia, European Union, Global, Japan, Nigeria, Norway, USA
  • -
  • April 29 2012

Norway, Nigeria, Colombia, Japan, the European Commission, and the World Bank joined a coalition April 24 formed earlier this year by the United States and other countries to curb black carbon, methane, and hydrofluorocarbons

WTO Ontario FIT ruling forthcoming

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • Canada, European Union, Global, Japan
  • -
  • March 11 2012

A World Trade Organization dispute panel announced last week that it will issue a ruling by September on Japan’s claims that provisions in Ontario’s green energy program violate global trade rules

WTO rules public can view Japanese-Canadian dispute hearing

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • Canada, Global, Japan
  • -
  • January 22 2012

On January 18, the World Trade Organization said the public can listen in on dispute panel proceedings between Japan and Canada over whether the domestic content requirements under Ontario's Feed-In Tariff (FIT) program violate WTO rules by requiring that wind and solar projects include a minimum amount of Ontario originated goods and services