We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

ECJ decision - are portfolio transfers exempt from VAT as insurance transactions?

  • Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Germany
  • -
  • January 20 2010

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has recently confirmed that a portfolio transfer of life reinsurance contracts will be subject to VAT

Intellectual property rights and technology: the “smartphone” wars

  • Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Germany
  • -
  • April 25 2012

Across the globe, disputes have broken out between manufacturers of smartphones and tablet computers (such as Apple and Samsung) about “standards-essential patents”, and whether competition law limits their enforcement

Birgit Bartsch v Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte (BSH) Altersfürsorge GmbH

  • Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Germany
  • -
  • June 12 2008

This European case relates to an "age-gap" provision contained in a German occupational pension scheme’s rules

ECJ decision - are portfolio transfers exempt from VAT as insurance transactions?

  • Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Germany
  • -
  • November 27 2009

On 22 October 2009, the ECJ released its judgment in the case of Swiss Re Germany Holding GmbH v Finanzamt München für Körperschaften (Case C-24208), confirming that a transfer of a portfolio of life reinsurance contracts, outside of a business transfer, will be subject to VAT at the standard rate

Technology: Google under challenge and what it means

  • Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Germany, USA
  • -
  • April 25 2012

Across the world, the internet giant Google has been facing numerous competition law challenges in the courts and before competition authorities, generally triggered by complaints from competitors and advertisers