We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 39

Measures to limit online copyright infringement

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • European Union, France
  • -
  • November 19 2012

The creative industries argue that piracy costs the industry £400m a year in lost revenue

International regulatory update - 27 31 January 2014

  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • -
  • European Union, France, Germany, Global, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • January 31 2014

The EU Commission has adopted a proposed regulation on structural measures to improve the resilience of EU credit institutions. The proposed

“PRISM” : Europe looks for appropriate remedies

  • Linklaters LLP
  • -
  • European Union, France, Germany, USA
  • -
  • September 19 2013

Although we do not yet know the full story about the scope of surveillance operated by the National Security Agency (NSA) on European citizen's

Selective distribution for cosmetics and EU competition rules on online sales

  • Portolano Cavallo Studio Legale
  • -
  • European Union, France
  • -
  • March 16 2011

On March 3 2011 the European Court of Justice (ECJ) Advocate General Ján Mazák issued a nonbinding opinion on Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique SAS v Président de l'Autorité de la Concurrence and Ministre de l'Économie, de l'Industrie et de l'Emploi (Case C-43909

Taxing the digital economy: major changes in 2014?

  • Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
  • -
  • European Union, France, United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 22 2014

2013 saw intense discussions, particularly in France and the UK, over how foreign-based online businesses had apparently failed to pay their ‘fair

Hogan Lovells global payments newsletter

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • European Union, France, Hong Kong, Kenya, Poland, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • July 26 2013

Europe: Commission publishes payments legislative package The European Commission has published two pieces of draft

eBay’s legal battles continue: a French victory and a prudent English test case

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • European Union, France, United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 28 2009

While a French court found that eBay was not liable to L’Oréal for the sale of counterfeit cosmetics on its auction website, an English court determined it required guidance from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the interpretation of applicable directives before deciding key issues in a proceeding between the two parties

Blocking online sales: new ruling from European Court of Justice

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • European Union, France
  • -
  • October 14 2011

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled that a restriction imposed on the online sale of cosmetics and personal care products breaches EU competition rules and cannot be justified in the terms of the block exemption for distribution and supply agreements

The liability of service providers in the information society. Reflections about the judgment of the European Court of Justice delivered on 23 March 2010 in joined cases C-236 to 238 08 Google v Louis Vuitton and others before the CJ (formerly ECJ)

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • European Union, France
  • -
  • June 21 2010

The liability of the company Google France as provider of data storage services online is analysed in the recent Judgment of the CJ in cases C-23608, C-23708 and C-23808

CJEU sends clear message that luxury brands cannot prevent retailers selling online

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • European Union, France
  • -
  • October 28 2011

On 13 October 2011, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down a judgment which makes it clear that a clause in a selective distribution agreement which operates as an absolute ban on internet sales has as its object the restriction of competition, and is therefore presumed to be unlawful