We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 35

Measures to limit online copyright infringement

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • European Union, France
  • -
  • November 19 2012

The creative industries argue that piracy costs the industry £400m a year in lost revenue

Selective distribution for cosmetics and EU competition rules on online sales

  • Portolano Cavallo Studio Legale
  • -
  • European Union, France
  • -
  • March 16 2011

On March 3 2011 the European Court of Justice (ECJ) Advocate General Ján Mazák issued a nonbinding opinion on Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique SAS v Président de l'Autorité de la Concurrence and Ministre de l'Économie, de l'Industrie et de l'Emploi (Case C-43909

Privacy and Data Protection - The EU modifies cookie rules

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • European Union, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 19 2011

26 May 2011 marked the date on which the new European rules on the use of cookies and similar web-tracking devices came into force - or at least it should have done

CJEU sends clear message that luxury brands cannot prevent retailers selling online

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • European Union, France
  • -
  • October 28 2011

On 13 October 2011, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down a judgment which makes it clear that a clause in a selective distribution agreement which operates as an absolute ban on internet sales has as its object the restriction of competition, and is therefore presumed to be unlawful

L’Oréal v. eBay: the Court of Justice of the European Union tightens liability of online marketplace operators the CJEU

  • Latham & Watkins LLP
  • -
  • European Union, France, Germany, United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 11 2011

The long awaited decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in L’Oréal v. eBay was handed down last month

Cosmetic company’s indirect ban on online selling ruled illegal

  • Nabarro LLP
  • -
  • European Union, France
  • -
  • December 1 2011

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has confirmed that a contractual ban on internet sales in a selective distribution arrangement will generally infringe EU law in the absence of good objective justification

Application of the "AdWords" decision of the CJEU and assessment of adverse effect on the trademark function of indicating origin

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • European Union, France
  • -
  • April 14 2011

The decision of the Court of Appeal provides the most detailed application of the recent "AdWords" decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in France

CNIL vs. Google, Act IV: Google against the rest of the world of the data protection regulators

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • European Union, France
  • -
  • October 18 2012

We have previously reported on the different requests and repeated questionnaires the Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) has sent to Google over the past few months regarding the evaluation of Google’s compliance with applicable European Data Protection Regulation concerning its new integrated privacy policy, as well as the new integrated platform launched March 1, 2012, despite the CNIL’s demand to postpone such launch

French Supreme Court refers Google AdWords questions to European Court of Justice

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • European Union, France
  • -
  • August 31 2008

The French Cour de Cassation has recently referred to the European Court of Justice several questions concerning the use of Google AdWords

Commission to intervene in French online selective distribution dispute

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union, France
  • -
  • May 15 2009

The European Commission is preparing to submit comments before the Paris Court of Appeal in a case brought by cosmetic manufacturer Pierre Fabre Dermo-cosmétique (Pierre Fabre) against a French Competition Authority decision