We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 16

Consumer goods: update

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Africa, European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 18 2013

As part of its Alcohol Strategy, published in March 2012, the UK Government has recently consulted on proposed policies, including a minimum until

A summary of major developments in key areas

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, European Union, Indonesia, Myanmar, United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 7 2013

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and institutional bodies have published the following guidance in relation to corporate governance and

Preview 2013 (UK law)

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 15 2013

2013 will herald some significant changes to the UK legal arena, notably in the corporate area in relation to executive remuneration and narrative

Consumer goods update October 2012

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Indonesia, Myanmar, United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 9 2012

Welcome to our consumer goods sector update a publication which highlights some key recent legal issues affecting consumer goods businesses

General counsel update: 31 May 2012

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Argentina, China, European Union, Hong Kong, Singapore, Spain, United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 31 2012

This is the twenty-ninth in our series of General Counsel Updates which aim to summarise major developments in key areas

Consumer goods: update

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • China, European Union, Indonesia, Netherlands, United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 29 2012

The Ministry of Commerce People’s Republic of China’s (“MOFCOM”) prohibition of CocaCola’s proposed acquisition of Huiyuan in 2009 generated significant controversy and prompted a fear that the Anti-Monopoly Law could be used to prevent foreign-multinational companies from acquiring well-known Chinese brands and businesses

Preview of 2012

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 12 2012

2012 will herald some significant changes to the legal arena, notably in the corporate area in relation to the Prospectus Directive, board diversity and corporate governance and reporting; in dispute resolution in relation to the Government's reforms to the civil litigation costs and funding regime; and in energy, real estate and construction areas where there are major changes to the carbon reduction commitment energy efficiency scheme, changes to the energy performance certificates regime; and also the establishment of the Green Investment Bank

General Counsel Update

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • China, European Union, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Singapore, United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 7 2011

This is the twenty-seventh in our series of General Counsel Updates which aim to summarise major developments in key areas

ECJ rules on parental liability and the Commission's duty to consider serious arguments put forward by the parent company aimed at rebutting liability

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • October 14 2011

The European Court of Justice's (ECJ) ruling in Elf Aquitaine (Case C-52109) of 29 September 2011 confirms that parent companies are able to rebut the presumption of their liability for anti-competitive behaviour by their subsidiaries and that the Commission needs to provide adequate reasons where it decides that the facts or legal arguments relied on by the parent company are not sufficient to rebut the presumption

Privilege after Akzo - a checklist for in-house lawyers

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • September 24 2010

The recent European Court of Justice (ECJ) decision in the Akzo case (see our e-bulletin of 14 September) has sparked renewed interest in legal professional privilege issues