We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 258

Does internet browsing infringe copyright?

  • Penningtons Solicitors LLP
  • -
  • Denmark, European Union
  • -
  • June 17 2013

This question is a feature of the latest instalment of a long running case, PRCA v NLA (formerly known as NLA v Meltwater News), a case which

Re-sale of digital music: US v EU approach

  • William Fry
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • June 4 2013

US - Rights Not Exhausted After First Sale ReDigi, a US company, allows its customers to re-sell their digital music through its online marketplace

IT and Outsourcing e-bulletin - 31 May 2013

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 31 2013

The UK Supreme Court has provisionally concluded that temporary copies of copyrighted materials created through web-browsing do not infringe

La firma ad referendum por España del convenio del Consejo de Europa sobre derecho de autor en el marco de la radiodifusión transfronteriza por satélite

  • Gómez-Acebo & Pombo Abogados
  • -
  • European Union, Spain
  • -
  • May 21 2013

En la reunión del Consejo de Ministros del pasado 3 de mayo de 2013, el Gobierno ha aprobado la firma ad referendum del Convenio Europeo relativo a

Resale of digital music: US v EU approach

  • William Fry
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

ReDigi, a US company, allows its customers to resell their digital music through its online marketplace. Users of the service can buy used digital

Intangibles and exhaustion: ReDigi and UsedSoft revisited

  • AJ Park
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 14 2013

As noted by Ben Challis in the 1709 Blog and by Eleonora Rosati on the IPKat, many commentators believe it wrong that a court could decide that first

Website copyright infringement: UK Supreme Court asks ECJ to confirm lawfulness of accessing copyright materials through internet browsers

  • White & Black Legal LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 5 2013

The UK Supreme Court ("UKSC"), in the case of Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v The Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd & Ors 2013 UKSC 18

Supreme Court refers question of whether internet browsing amounts to copyright infringement to the CJEU

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • May 2 2013

In the case of the PRCA v the NLA, relating to the Meltwater online media monitoring service, the Supreme Court has referred to the CJEU the question

General Court partially annuls the Commission decision finding anti-competitive conduct on the part of copyright collecting societies

  • Stibbe
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • May 2 2013

On 12 April 2013, the General Court partially affirmed and partially annulled the Commission's decision finding that the International Confederation

Not just because you say so; EU General Court guidance on proving parallel behaviour is not independent

  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • May 1 2013

An EU General Court (GC) judgment has considered the difficult issue of independent parallel behaviour by competitors under EU competition law, and