We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

General counsel update

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • China, European Union, Germany, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Mongolia, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • July 11 2012

This is the thirtieth in our series of general counsel updates which aim to summarise major developments in key areas

General counsel update: 31 May 2012

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Argentina, China, European Union, Hong Kong, Singapore, Spain, United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 31 2012

This is the twenty-ninth in our series of General Counsel Updates which aim to summarise major developments in key areas

General Counsel Update

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • China, European Union, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Singapore, United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 7 2011

This is the twenty-seventh in our series of General Counsel Updates which aim to summarise major developments in key areas

ECJ confirms that legal professional privilege under EU law does not extend to communications with in-house lawyers

  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Singapore
  • -
  • October 27 2010

In Akzo Nobel Chemicals Limited and Akcros Chemicals Limited v Commission of the European Communities, the European Court of Justice (the "ECJ") considered whether emails exchanged between a company's manager and its in-house lawyer were covered by legal professional privilege ("LPP"