We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

International regulatory update 7 - 11 January 2013

  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • -
  • European Union, France, Global, India, Poland, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • January 14 2013

EMIR: Extension of scrutiny period for Commission Delegated Regulations Basel III: Basel Committee releases revised version of Liquidity Coverage

Holding parents liable for their children's wrongs: the U.S. and EU diverge in the corporate governance context

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • August 12 2010

Large, multinational companies devote significant effort to develop effective, though often Byzantine, corporate structures

Claims issues drive network decisions

  • RPC
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • May 30 2008

In April 2008, the European Federation of Accountants (FEE) published its study, Trans-National Organisations and Practices within the Accountancy Profession

The Akzo Nobel decision: a warning to the unwary

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • September 28 2010

The recent decision of the European Court of Justice in Akzo Nobel is an important reminder of the perils of assuming that jurisdictions outside the United States give the same status to in-house counsel as our own courts

Recent decision of judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of EU in Akzo Nobel Chemicals, et al v. European Commission imperils attorney client privilege for foreign based subsidiaries, including in U.S. tax proceedings and non-tax proceedings

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • June 26 2011

In a decision that has wide-sweeping implications for companies that are doing business in the EU or otherwise become a party to a legal or administrative proceeding governed by the EU, as well as to American persons engaged, directly or indirectly such as through ownership of a controlled subsidiary or company in the EU, the Grand Chamber of the EU Court affirmed the decision of the Court of First Review (trial court) holding that various claims of legal privilege made by Akzo Nobel Chemicals and Akcros Chemicals for communications made to the companies' in-house companies were not privileged and thus were discoverable under by the European Commission

Recent developments for the fourth quarter 2011

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada, China, Denmark, European Union, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Switzerland, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • March 15 2012

The end of the year and beginning of a new year is always a busy time for us, as it is for most of our clients

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy