We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 347

The Influence of ambiguity in claim on the patent infringement Wanqing Bai v. Shanghai Tianxiang Industrial Co., Ltd. et.al.(Article No. 6 from “China patent case review 2014” by Beijing East IP Ltd.)

  • Beijing East IP Ltd
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • November 19 2014

Regarding problems raised under the condition that distinct defects existed in a claim make the protection scope of the claim unclear. For example

Arkema France wins the first instance of the patent invalidation administrative case

  • Liu, Shen & Associates
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • November 17 2014

On May 19, 2014, Beijing No.1 Intermediate People's Court entered a judgment to uphold the No. 19514 Decision on Invalidation (hereafter referred to

如何站在欧美视角撰写 PCT 国际申请文件

  • Kangxin Partners PC
  • -
  • China, Global, USA
  • -
  • November 17 2014

近年来在中国提交的 PCT 申请日益增多据统计2011 年中国 PCT 国际申请量达到 1.64 万件较 2010 年同比增长 33.4是全球增长最快的国家

利用防侵权检索防范中国市场知识产权风险

  • Kangxin Partners PC
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • November 14 2014

今天众多海外企业以及中国企业都从中国庞大的市场上获得了回报中国市场带来了许多发展机遇企业将它们的未来的业务增长点寄希望于中国市场或者设立子公司或 者设立办事处工厂等等

Importance of specification on claims interpretation Dongguan Jiachang Toys Co.,Ltd. et.al. v. Zhaoqing New Leader Battery Industry Co.,Ltd. et.al.(Article No. 5 from “China patent case review 2014” by Beijing East IP Ltd.)

  • Beijing East IP Ltd
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • November 12 2014

When evaluating whether a claim has novelty andor inventiveness, the protection scope of the claim should be determined first. Article 56, Paragraph

化学医药发明充分公开审查的最新趋势新的希望

  • CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • November 5 2014

在准备递交专利申请时需要满足充分公开的要求这一点在中国尤为重要有数据表明在 2012 年前一旦专利申请在中国因为公开不充分而被驳回的话只有不到 5 成的案件能 在复审阶段逆转局面

How to interpret inconsistent claims with detail specifications Xi’an Qinbang Telecommunication Material Co.,Ltd. v. Wuxi Longsheng Cable Material Factory et.al.(Article No. 4 from “China patent case review 2014” by Beijing East IP Ltd.)

  • Beijing East IP Ltd
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • November 5 2014

Obvious drafting mistakes in the claims of a granted patent do not inevitably render the patent invalid. If those skilled in the art upon reading the

Announcement on the launch of the Sino-US priority electronic document exchange services (Mainland China)

  • Lee Tsai & Partners
  • -
  • China, USA
  • -
  • October 31 2014

To facilitate priority right application by patent applicants and enhance patent examination efficiency, the State Intellectual Property Office

The story of battling giants: comments on Goertek Acoustics v. Knowles Electronics

  • CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • October 31 2014

In April 2014, the Weifang City Intermediate People's Court made decisions in two of five patent infringement lawsuits between GoerTek Acoustics and

楼氏电子与歌尔声学专利侵权诉讼评析

  • CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • October 31 2014

2014 年 4 月潍坊市中级人民法院针对歌尔声学股份有限公司以下简称“歌尔声学”诉楼氏电子苏州有限公司以下简称“楼氏电子苏州”专利 侵权系列案做出了部分判决