We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 350

试论在ipod进行的生物材料样本国 内保藏在中国审查实践中不被接受之法律依据

  • Kangxin Partners PC
  • -
  • China, Japan
  • -
  • December 2 2014

对涉及生物材料的专利申请日本申请人的通常做法是在优先权日前先在国际保藏单位 IPOD 进行国内保藏待打算基于优先权申请进行国际申请时再由国内保藏转为国际保藏

通过假想案例讨论侵权的问题

  • Kangxin Partners PC
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • December 2 2014

下文中所提到的涉案专利以及被控侵权产品均是假想的其并不是真实的案例

如何站在欧美视角撰写 PCT 国际申请文件

  • Kangxin Partners PC
  • -
  • China, European Union, USA
  • -
  • November 19 2014

近年来在中国提交的 PCT 申请日益增多据统计2011 年中国 PCT 国际申请量达到 1.64 万件较 2010 年同比增长 33.4是全球增长最快的国家

The Influence of ambiguity in claim on the patent infringement Wanqing Bai v. Shanghai Tianxiang Industrial Co., Ltd. et.al.(Article No. 6 from “China patent case review 2014” by Beijing East IP Ltd.)

  • Beijing East IP Ltd
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • November 19 2014

Regarding problems raised under the condition that distinct defects existed in a claim make the protection scope of the claim unclear. For example

Arkema France wins the first instance of the patent invalidation administrative case

  • Liu, Shen & Associates
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • November 17 2014

On May 19, 2014, Beijing No.1 Intermediate People's Court entered a judgment to uphold the No. 19514 Decision on Invalidation (hereafter referred to

如何站在欧美视角撰写 PCT 国际申请文件

  • Kangxin Partners PC
  • -
  • China, Global, USA
  • -
  • November 17 2014

近年来在中国提交的 PCT 申请日益增多据统计2011 年中国 PCT 国际申请量达到 1.64 万件较 2010 年同比增长 33.4是全球增长最快的国家

利用防侵权检索防范中国市场知识产权风险

  • Kangxin Partners PC
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • November 14 2014

今天众多海外企业以及中国企业都从中国庞大的市场上获得了回报中国市场带来了许多发展机遇企业将它们的未来的业务增长点寄希望于中国市场或者设立子公司或 者设立办事处工厂等等

Importance of specification on claims interpretation Dongguan Jiachang Toys Co.,Ltd. et.al. v. Zhaoqing New Leader Battery Industry Co.,Ltd. et.al.(Article No. 5 from “China patent case review 2014” by Beijing East IP Ltd.)

  • Beijing East IP Ltd
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • November 12 2014

When evaluating whether a claim has novelty andor inventiveness, the protection scope of the claim should be determined first. Article 56, Paragraph

化学医药发明充分公开审查的最新趋势新的希望

  • CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • November 5 2014

在准备递交专利申请时需要满足充分公开的要求这一点在中国尤为重要有数据表明在 2012 年前一旦专利申请在中国因为公开不充分而被驳回的话只有不到 5 成的案件能 在复审阶段逆转局面

How to interpret inconsistent claims with detail specifications Xi’an Qinbang Telecommunication Material Co.,Ltd. v. Wuxi Longsheng Cable Material Factory et.al.(Article No. 4 from “China patent case review 2014” by Beijing East IP Ltd.)

  • Beijing East IP Ltd
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • November 5 2014

Obvious drafting mistakes in the claims of a granted patent do not inevitably render the patent invalid. If those skilled in the art upon reading the