We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 157

CCPIT wins re-trial case in Supreme People’s Court concerning invalidation against trademark "采埃孚(ZF in Chinese)"

  • CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • August 26 2014

The Supreme People's Court has recently made a judgment on the re-trial case concerning the trademark Reg. No. 3060409 "??? (ZF in Chinese)", with ZF

Tesla Motors Inc. sued for infringement in China

  • RK Dewan & Co
  • -
  • China, India
  • -
  • July 29 2014

Tesla Motors Inc. sued for infringement in China In what appears to be a classic case of trademark trolling and is a surprising development, Tesla

Judgment on “preemptive registration by unfair means” in Article 31 of the Chinese Trademark Law

  • Beijing East IP Ltd
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • July 25 2014

In February 2013, the Supreme People's Court (SPC) rendered a decision The SPC Administrative Order (2012) Zhi Xing Zi No. 9 (the SPC No. 9 Order

Trademark prosecution case of “Duck King in Chinese”: prior rights protection shall coordinate with maintenance of market order

  • Beijing East IP Ltd
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • July 21 2014

Beijing High Court rendered the re-trial judgment in December 2010, eventually putting an end to the trademark prosecution case of “Duck King in

New guidelines for examining and ascertaining trademark rights in administrative cases

  • Wilkinson & Grist
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • July 9 2014

The Beijing Higher People’s Court has issued a new set of guidelines for examining and ascertaining trademark rights in administrative appeals and

Judicial interpretation related to jurisdiction and application of law of the amended trademark law released

  • Tsai Lee & Chen
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • July 8 2014

"The Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Issues Concerning the Jurisdiction over Trademark Cases and Application of Law after the

The Chevron case: differential treatment under Chinese and Indian trademark laws

  • RK Dewan & Co
  • -
  • China, India
  • -
  • July 3 2014

Jinchun Ji sought trademark registration for "雪佛龙" ("Chevron" in Chinese version) before the Chinese Trademark Office (TMO) in respect of goods

How to protect packaging under Chinese law

  • HFG Law Firm & Intellectual Property Practice
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • June 18 2014

While passing off is on the rise in China, legal instruments are available to guard against it. A coordinated strategy should use different IP laws

延续性商标的近似判断

  • Wan Hui Da Intellectual Property Agency
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • June 18 2014

商标申请人的基础注册商标拥有较高的市场声誉和知名度商标申请人再在相同或类似商品上申请注册与基础注册商标相近似的商标被异议商标他人提出异议但并未提交引证商标的使用或知名度证据当相关公众会将被异议商标与基础注册商标及其权利人联系在一起时可以认定被异议商标与引证商标不构成近似商标使用在相同或类似商品上不会造成相关公众对商品来源的混淆误认

蒙牛公司打击“迷人”的山寨货

  • Wan Hui Da Intellectual Property Agency
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • June 18 2014

2013年中央电视台曾经专门做过一期名为"'迷人'的山寨货"的节目引起了巨大反响各类仿冒名牌产品的"山寨货"纷纷曝光其中也包括山寨的"特仑苏"产品本案将向您介绍蒙牛公司为捍卫自己的"特仑苏"品牌向山寨货发起的一次反击最终本案被告天津特仑苏公司被法院判决停止侵犯蒙牛公司"特仑苏"商标权并变更企业名称 内蒙古蒙牛乳业集团股份有限公司下称蒙牛公司成立于1999年是国内知名的奶制品企业其高端牛奶品牌"特仑苏"更是久负盛名蒙牛公司的特仑苏商标及商品如图一二三 图一 图二 图三 2008年4月28赵某某刘某某共同出资设立天津市特仑苏乳业有限公司下称天津公司并生产销售了"山寨特仑苏产品"被告的涉案标志及产品图样如图四至八 图四 图五 图六 图七 图八 2013年8月21日蒙牛公司在北京市第三中级人民法院诉讼向天津公司提出民事诉讼请求法院判令特仑苏公司立即停止商标侵权及不正当竞争行为 蒙牛公司的"特仑苏"品牌在2005年一经推出即在市场上产生了广泛的影响能够迅速为中国消费者所熟知近年来在国际国内范围内获得诸多荣誉2014年1月被国家商标局认定为驰名商标天津公司不仅将"特仑苏"商标作为其企业名称登记注册还生产了不同系列的"山寨特仑苏"其产品在包装装潢上与蒙牛公司特仑苏产品十分接近并在多处突出使用了"特仑苏"商标在市场上使消费者真假难辨严重损害了蒙牛公司的"特仑苏"商标权及其知名商品特有包装装潢 事实上天津公司的侵权行为已非首次在2007年12月17刘某某赵某某就曾出资设立呼伦贝尔特仑苏乳业有限公司并生产过相应的侵权产品后被内蒙古自治区工商管理部门以侵犯蒙牛公司特仑苏知名商标特有名称为由被依法查处呼伦贝尔特仑苏公司也被责令变更企业名称 三中院经审理认为天津公司应立即停止侵犯"特仑苏"商标权的行为"特仑苏"商标在2008年天津公司成立之前就构成未注册驰名商标其注册"天津特仑苏公司"违背了诚实信用原则与公认的商业道德应于30日内变更内企业名称法院在综合考虑了"特仑苏"商标知名度侵权行为持续时间侵权范围以及原告的合理支出的情况下判决赔偿50万人民币 短评 本案作为北京市第三中级人民法院审理的第一起知识产权案件受到社会公众的广泛关注三中院在审理本案过程中准确把握了双方当事人的诉辩主张不仅判决天津公司立即停止侵权行为也判决要求变更企业名称从根本上解决了蒙牛公司的维权问题严厉打击了天津公司恶意搭便车的侵权行为规范了市场秩序 此外法院结合蒙牛公司提交相应知名度证据后依法认定了在2008年之前"特仑苏"就构成未注册驰名商标且充分考虑了天津公司的恶意背景在驰名商标司法保护的大环境下作出了合法且合理的判断为真正商标权利人提供了应有的高强度保护 点评人张涵