We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 59

Should arbitral awards that have been set aside be enforced in a different jurisdiction?

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • China, Hong Kong
  • -
  • April 30 2013

Achieving a favorable arbitral award is sometimes the easy part of the dispute resolution process. Where the successful party is awarded money

SPC releases report on IPR protection by Chinese courts & announces leading cases of year 2012

  • China Patent Agent (HK) Ltd
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • April 22 2013

The Supreme People's Court of China (SPC) recently published the annual report on intellectual property rights protection by Chinese courts in 2012

The potential effects of Chinese state secrecy laws on disclosure in arbitration

  • Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • December 13 2012

Recent cases have renewed concerns among practitioners of international arbitration and litigation about the breadth of Chinese state secrecy laws and the effect these laws may have on disputes involving Chinese companies

International mediation guide

  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • -
  • Belgium, Brazil, China, Czech Republic, European Union, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Morocco, Netherlands, Poland, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, Turkey, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • March 27 2013

We have compiled this Mediation Guide with a view to providing a better understanding Of the differences between jurisdictions in respect of

The recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in China

  • Dacheng Law Offices LLP
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • December 5 2012

Case involving the application by a United States company for the recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award rendered by the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce

Dispute resolution in Asia

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Australia, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam
  • -
  • December 6 2011

The 4th edition of the Dispute Resolution in Asia aims to bring together the expertise of our lawyers in the region and help our clients understand the complexities of the various legal systems, courts and dispute resolution proceedings of the different jurisdictions in Asia Pacific

Fracture in Chinese arbitration tribunal leads to uncertainty for foreign investors

  • Faegre Baker Daniels
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • November 13 2012

On August 1, 2012, the Beijing headquarters of the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission issued a statement suspending the authority of its Shanghai and Shenzhen sub-commissions to accept and administer disputes

Case analysis on how Chinese courts and arbitration institutes decide cases

  • Dacheng Law Offices LLP
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • April 15 2013

The Plaintiff contracted to build an infrastructure project, and the defendant offered preferential policies but failed to deliver them at last

non-convention enforcement of arbitral awards in mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan
  • -
  • December 19 2011

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) today has three separate legal systems

Fair and equitable treatment should the standard be differentiated according to level of development, Government capacity and resources of host countries?

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • February 13 2013

Fair and equitable treatment (FET) originated from the Havana Charter of 1948 and the adoption of the FET standard accelerated in the late 1960s and