We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

The "Muji case"- Ryohin Keikaku Co., Ltd. v. TRAB: does it define trademark use for brand recovery only or does it reopen the issue on whether OEM manufacturing constitutes use?

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • November 19 2012

The Japanese company, Ryohin Keikaku Co., Ltd., is the holding company that operates the exclusive Muji stores seen internationally

Original equipment manufacturing revisited is it trade mark use in China?

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • October 31 2011

Many foreign companies produce goods in China through Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs

OEM products may not infringe trademarks in China - Shanghai High Court 3rd Civil Tribunal (IP) Final No.65 (2009), decision of 2 November 2009, Shanghai Shenda Audio Electronics v. Jiulide Electronics (Shanghai)

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • October 15 2010

The Shanghai Higher People's Court upheld a lower court's decision that OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) products do not infringe a registered trademark in China if they are manufactured and exported to the order of a different owner of the same trademark abroad

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy