We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 28

China's new state secrets regulations clarify responsibilities and boost transparency

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • March 14 2014

China’s Implementing Regulations of the Protection of State Secrets Law ( 保守国家秘密法实施条例)( the “Regulations”) came into force earlier this month. The

CIETAC update: the Supreme People’s Court weighs in to resolve conflicting enforcement of awards

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • November 8 2013

Our previous alerts discussed the continuing rift between the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission ("CIETAC") and its prior

CIETAC terminates authority of Shanghai and Shenzhen Sub-Commissions

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • January 25 2013

On 31 December 2012, the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission ("CIETAC") issued an announcement ("Announcement") terminating

Limitation period calculated from date when the right to bring an action arises Taikang People’s Court, Henan

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • September 11 2012

In a debt recovery action without a written agreement or specified performance period, a court has held that the limitation period begins to run from when the right to bring an action arises

Shareholders penalized for failure to disclose details of shareholding China Securities Regulatory Commission

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • September 11 2012

The China Securities Regulatory Commission (“CSRC”) has recently warned and imposed administrative penalties on two individuals who failed to disclose details of their shareholding

Shareholder fails in claim against executive who misappropriated company assets Nantong Gangzha People’s Court, Jiangsu

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • September 11 2012

An investor in the institutional shareholder of a joint venture company was found to have no legal rights to claim damages against the company’s executive for misappropriation of funds

Costs order enforced by direct debit of Alipay account Jiangsu Nanjing People’s Intermediate Court

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • September 11 2012

A court has enforced outstanding court costs by directly debiting a defendant’s “Alipay” account

Compensation granted for unilateral termination of distributorship Huaiyin People’s Court

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • September 11 2012

The effective preservation of evidence has allowed a distributor to successfully claim loss of expected profits arising out of the termination of its contract

Draft of the state secret protection law implementing regulations State Council Legislative Affairs Office

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • September 11 2012

On 15 May 2012, the State Council Legislative Affairs Office released a Draft of the State Secret Protection Law Implementing Regulations (“Draft Regulations”) as the implementing regulations for the PRC Law on Guarding State Secrets (also known as the “State Secrets Law”, revised in 2010

First case of individual imprisoned for obtaining leaked CPI data Beijing’s No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • September 11 2012

The Beijing’s No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court has for the first time sanctioned an individual for illegally obtaining CPI data