We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
The plaintiff, a courier service provider brought an action against the defendant when a substantial service contract was awarded by the defendant to a competitor
In this production motion, Master Haberman found that while evidence is certainly helpful to show whether the documents sought do or do not exist, the motion itself is not the appropriate forum to consider evidence pertaining to the merits of the case in order to limit production
