We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 94

Ontario Court of Appeal upholds environmental remediation order against innocent landowners

  • Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 15 2013

The Ontario Court of Appeal has ruled that innocent landowners can be subject to remediation orders even if they are not responsible for the

Contaminated land: commercial, regulatory and insolvency considerations

  • Miller Thomson LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 14 2013

For some, environmental liability is akin to a game of hot potato. In other words, no one wants to be the one left holding the potato when the music

The impact of recent Mining Act amendments on mining tenures in Ontario

  • McMillan LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 1 2013

In 2009, Ontario introduced Bill 173 to amend the Mining Act. These amendments are being phased in with the goal of having them all in force by the

Proposed management framework for forfeited corporate property

  • Torys LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 21 2012

The Ministry of Infrastructure (MOI) has proposed a new management framework for forfeited corporate property. The goals of this framework are to (i

Canada

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 5 2012

The British Columbia Environmental Appeal Board made a preliminary ruling that the Fort Nelson First Nation had standing under the provincial Water Act to

Court finds plaintiffs caused their own misfortunes regardless of prior owner’s potential negligence

  • Torys LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 3 2012

On November 21, 2012, the Ontario Court of Appeal (OCA) reaffirmed that for a plaintiff to receive damages from a negligence claim, the defendant’s negligence must have actually caused the plaintiff’s loss

British Columbia Court of Appeal: city owes no duty to consult first nations

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 23 2012

On September 24, 2012, in Neskonlith Indian Band v. Salmon Arm (City) (Neskonlith), the British Columbia Court of Appeal (BCCA) dismissed the appeal of the Neskonlith Indian Band (Band), confirming that the City of Salmon Arm (City) did not owe a constitutional duty to consult the Band in respect of the issuance of a development permit

Government releases first regional plan under aAberta’s land-use framework

  • Torys LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 5 2012

On August 22, 2012, the government of Alberta publicly released the Lower Athabasca Regional Plan, which covers approximately 93,212 square kilometres of northeastern Alberta

Doing business in Canada

  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • September 17 2012

Unlike the United States, Canada was not created by a unilateral declaration of independence from the colonial occupation of England

Not at fault? You may still pay - Faultless Owners of Contaminated Property Beware

  • WeirFoulds LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • September 5 2012

The recent decision of the Divisional Court in the case of The Corporation of the City of Kawartha Lakes v Director, Ministry of the Environment (the Kawartha Lakes Decision), is a reminder of the risks you bear, as owners or tenants, under the Environmental Protection Act (EPA), for contamination which you did not cause