We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
On September 24, 2012, in Neskonlith Indian Band v. Salmon Arm (City) (Neskonlith), the British Columbia Court of Appeal (BCCA) dismissed the appeal of the Neskonlith Indian Band (Band), confirming that the City of Salmon Arm (City) did not owe a constitutional duty to consult the Band in respect of the issuance of a development permit
On September 24, 2012, in Neskonlith Indian Band v. Salmon Arm (City) (Neskonlith), the British Columbia Court of Appeal (BCCA) dismissed the appeal of the Neskonlith Indian Band (Band), confirming that the City of Salmon Arm (City) did not owe a constitutional duty to consult the Band in respect of the issuance of a development permit
On November 19, 2010, the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") released its fifth decision dealing with the Crown’s duty to consult aboriginal peoples Beckman v. Little SalmonCarmacks First Nation ("Little Salmon"
On April 3, 2009 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice granted an interlocutory injunction in favour of the plaintiff John Voortman & Associates Ltd. ("Voortman") against the defendants the Haudenosaunee Confederacy Chiefs Council and the Haudenosaunee Men’s Fire of the Grand River ("HMF") restraining them from entering the plaintiff’s property and from obstructing the property’s development
