We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 195

YouTube, Facebook, Netflix liable to pay for music in Canada rules Copyright Board

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 21 2014

On Friday, the Copyright Board released a decision and certified two SOCAN tariffs, Tariffs 22.D.1 (Internet - Online Audiovisual Services) and 22.D

Successful plaintiff’s appeal for more damages dismissed; plaintiff also forced to pay double costs due to defendant’s Rule 420 offer to settle

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 10 2014

Ms. Leuthold, a photo-journalist, owned the copyright in several images taken during the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center on September 11

The relationship between copyright and social media: “it’s complicated”

  • Coleman Greig Lawyers
  • -
  • Australia, Canada
  • -
  • June 30 2014

We know that it's common practice to copy photos from Google Images, but just because everyone is doing it doesn't make it right. Whether you are

The Aereo decision Canadian content?

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • June 26 2014

Careful observers of the United States Supreme Court's 6-3 decision yesterday in American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. et al v. Aereo, Inc. may have

“Made in Canada” online copyright infringement regime coming into force

  • Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • June 24 2014

The Canadian Government announced on June 17, 2014 that Canada's new Notice and Notice regime for online copyright infringement will come into force

Do authors of artistic works still have strength in numbers? Has a recent Supreme Court ruling created a division that weakens their position?

  • Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • June 23 2014

On June 12, 2014, the Supreme Court published the reasoning for its decision in CAR-FAC RAAV v. The National Gallery of Canada. Under the federal

Battling the Dragons: would moral rights have made a difference in recent Dragons’ Den case?

  • Davis LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • June 19 2014

On May 22, 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") refused to grant leave to appeal to Quebec lawyer Marc Ribeiro and his company MHR Board Game

Re:Sound flexes its musical muscles

  • Stewart McKelvey
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 26 2014

Re:Sound Tariff No. 6.B (Use of Recorded Music to Accompany Physical Activities), sets the royalties to be paid for the performance in public or

Re:sound tariff 6B or not 6B

  • Stewart McKelvey
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 9 2014

As noted in a previous blog post on Re:Sound tariffs, Re:Sound Tariff No. 6.B (Use of Recorded Music to Accompany Physical Activities), sets the

Court assesses statutory damages for breach of copyright in language proficiency tests

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 30 2014

This was an uncontested assessment of damages for breach of copyright. The Plaintiff obtained summary judgment (decision here) and the Court directed