We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 385

More on damages under PIPEDA by the Federal Court

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • August 18 2014

In Henry v Bell Mobility, 2014 FC 555, the Federal Court considered the extent of damages to which the Plaintiff was entitled when a Bell Mobility

Ontario Court of Appeal upholds finding of breach of fiduciary duty respecting executive compensation

  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • August 8 2014

The Ontario Court of Appeal recently upheld a trial court decision which concluded that the directors of Unique Broadband Systems, Inc. breached

Legitimate businesses should be at least as concerned as fraudsters about the Competition Act-related amendments under Canada's new Anti-Spam Legislation

  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • August 5 2014

On July 1, 2014, Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (“CASL”) the Canadian version of U.S. CAN-SPAM came into force. While much has been written about

CASL update: CRTC corporate compliance programs guidelines

  • Aird & Berlis LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 25 2014

As the effective date of Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL) has passed, and most organizations have scrambled to determine what the legislations

Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL) now in effect

  • Varnum
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • July 24 2014

The purpose of this Client Advisory is to address the risks associated with sending commercial electronic messages without complying with the

Employer prevented from tracing company-issued mobile phone calls

  • Miller Thomson LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 16 2014

Another employer has run afoul of privacy laws in Canada, and, once again, the employer's actions may have been lawful if the employer had a clearly

US Supreme Court clarifies law on warrantless cell phone searches. Will the Supreme Court of Canada follow?

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • July 15 2014

Lower courts in both Canada and the US have been deeply divided on the application of their respective Supreme Courts' precedents on whether the

A provincial divide: BC Court refuses to certify “system access fee” case despite a Saskatchewan Court certifying a similar case

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 10 2014

On June 5, 2014, the B.C. Supreme Court refused to certify a proposed class action against a group of cell service providers (Rogers, Fido, Bell

New Canada Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL): a litigation perspective

  • Klein Moynihan Turco LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • July 9 2014

CASL was passed into law on December 15, 2010, over vigorous objection by various business interests, and became effective on July 1, 2014. CASL can

New anti-spam rules to protect Canadian residents take effect

  • Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 9 2014

Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL), which sets forth guidelines for and places certain restrictions on sending "commercial electronic messages"