We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 565

Theme 4: implications for class action strategy of Supreme Court decisions

  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 18 2014

A further theme of 2014 was the potential impact of general litigation decisions on class action practice. In particular, two decisions released by

2014: the SCC year in review

  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 16 2014

This article summarizes Gowlings picks for the most important decisions from the Supreme Court of Canada in 2014.Canada (Attorney General) v

Directors need to meet high standard to avoid liability

  • Bennett Jones LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 16 2014

The Tax Court of Canada again confirmed that directors of corporations will have a high burden to meet to establish a due diligence defence and avoid

Interlocutory injunction granted: Defendants ordered to stop using Plaintiff’s business name

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 16 2014

The Plaintiff applied for an interlocutory injunction to stop the personal Defendant and corporate Defendant, Alpha Neon Sign Consulting Ltd., from

Supreme Court to clarify the liability of Canadian corporations for acts of their foreign affiliates

  • Bennett Jones LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 11 2014

The Supreme Court of Canada today heard argument in a case that will clarify whether a judgment obtained in a foreign country against a foreign

Osler’s insights on key developments in 2014 and their implications for Canadian business.

  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 9 2014

Four securities regulatory developments in 2014 warrant special attention:The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) proposed a new “permitted bid”

A leap of good faith? Practical implications of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Bhasin v. Hrynew for contracting parties

  • WeirFoulds LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 8 2014

In Bhasin v. Hrynew, the Supreme Court of Canada recognized a new general duty of honesty in contractual performance. Writing for the unanimous Court

Actions speak louder Court of Appeal for Ontario confirms debtor creditor relationship between parties to a “broker agreement”

  • Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 5 2014

In proceedings pursuant to the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Actconcerning The Cash Store Financial Services et al., the Court of Appeal for

Incrementalism and good faith in contract law the new duty of honesty (and beyond?)

  • Dentons
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 3 2014

The Supreme Court of Canada’s (SCC) recent decision in Bhasin v. Hrynew 2014 SCC 71 (Bhasin) attempts to both clarify and extend the role of good

How not to deal with executive compensation

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 2 2014

The following is a story of executive compensation gone awry. In 2003, Unique Broadband Systems, Inc. (UBS), a public company listed on the TSX