We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

Supreme Court lays out clear disclosure obligations for public issuers

  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 27 2011

The Supreme Court has dismissed a shareholders' action in which a public issuer was accused of failing to include details of a conflict of interest in its disclosure

Another class action certified against issuer for misrepresentations

  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 21 2011

We recently reported on Public Companies’ Increased Exposure in Secondary Markets, set out in Justice van Rensburg’s decision in Silver v. Imax

Don’t hold back: proxyholders’ discretion not fettered by instructions to “WITHHOLD” (January 2011)

  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • January 26 2011

Does a proxyholder have any discretion to cast a vote when a proxy voting ballot provides an instruction to "WITHHOLD"?

Different approaches to granting leave to securities-holders for bringing actions against issuers

  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • June 22 2010

Opposite conclusions have been come to in courts in Ontario and the United States on the question of whether a security-holder ought to have standing to sue a reporting issuer