We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 196

Reynolds Presto Products Inc. v. P.R.S. Mediterranean Ltd., 2013 FCA 119

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 8 2013

The Court of Appeal has overturned a lower court decision and struck the mark NEOWEB from the register because it is confusing with the earlier

Ontario Court of Appeal provides guidance on the definition of "franchisor’s associate"

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 6 2013

A recent decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario (ONCA) helps define the concept of "control," as it relates to the definition of a "franchisor's

FCA dismisses appeal; refuses to strike paragraphs from statement of claim

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 1 2013

The Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) upheld the decision of the trial judge dismissing a motion brought by Beyond the Rack to strike paragraphs from

Retailers’ challenge of the OQLF’s interpretation of the Charter of the French Language

  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 30 2013

On October 9, 2012, six retailers, BEST BUY, Costco, GAP, OLD NAVY, GUESS? And WAL-MART, filed a motion in the Superior Court of Quebec seeking a

SC denies request for leave to appeal decision preventing sale of no-name cigarettes

  • Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 23 2013

The Supreme Court of Canada has denied Philip Morris's request for leave to appeal the precedent-setting decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in

Trade-mark oppositions: when “close” becomes “too close”

  • Field Law LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 18 2013

When is one trade-mark too close to another? This is a question that we work through collaboratively with our trade-mark clients. The short answer

The Thymes they are a changin’

  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 17 2013

Canadian trademark applications must identify a filing ground, the most common of which are (1) use in Canada; (2) proposed use in Canada; and (3

Is e-commerce changing the definition of trademark “use” in Canada?

  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 17 2013

Several recent decisions of the Canadian courts and the Trade-marks Opposition Board (the "Board") analyze the impact of e-commerce on claims of

French press

  • Goldman Sloan Nash & Haber LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • April 3 2013

Bodum USA Inc., and its associated companies (“Bodum”) manufacture and distribute housewares. Bodum owns a Canadian trade mark registration for the

Intellectual property weekly abstracts bulletin

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 1 2013

The Court granted a Prohibition Order to AstraZeneca, preventing Ranbaxy from entering the market with a generic version of ompeprazole until the