We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

Supreme Court of Canada rules on workplace computer pornography: employee privacy rights limit police

  • Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 6 2012

On October 19, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada issued its ruling in R. v. Cole

The HR space: when can surveillance tapes be used as evidence?

  • Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 25 2011

Another recent case dealing with collection of personal information about employees, this time through surveillance, emphasizes the importance of good employment policy language

Workplace computer pornography ruling: police need search warrant; employer has latitude

  • Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 24 2011

In a decision released this week, the Ontario Court of Appeal issued a surprising ruling affecting privacy rights in the workplace

With the click of a mouse: employee fired for disseminating inappropriate e-mail at work

  • Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 20 2010

While many employees are allowed to access and use the Internet and email on company computers for "limited" personal use, it is not uncommon for them to misuse this privilege

Nota bene: using personal notes on file

  • Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • June 1 2009

In its recent interlocutory decision in Ville de Mont-Royal v. Saleh et al., the Administrative Tribunal of Québec (the “ATQ”) reiterated the rules governing the admissibility of personal notes contained on file as evidence