We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In Paul Antle and Renee Marquis-Antle Spousal Trust v. The Queen, the Tax Court considered a series of transactions implemented by a Canadian resident taxpayer known as a “capital property step-up strategy”
In Garron, M. et al. v. The Queen, the Tax Court of Canada considered whether two Barbados trusts (the “Trusts”) were entitled to claim the benefit of the capital gains exemption in Article XIV(4) of the Canada-Barbados Income Tax Convention (the “Treaty”) on their dispositions to an arm’s length purchaser of shares of two Canadian holding corporations which indirectly owned a Canadian automotive parts manufacturing and assembly business
In a Taxpayers' Alert issued in March 2007, the Canada Revenue Agency indicated "Where You Live Matters: The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) is warning Canadians to properly indicate their province or territory of residence on their tax returns."
