Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 14
Employer-provided parking: when is it a taxable benefit to the employee?
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- October 1 2012
Employee compensation may include not only salary and wages but also non-cash compensation such as stock options and non-monetary benefits such as supplemental health and life insurance
Barbados spousal trust strategy fails Canadian trust and GAAR tests
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- October 7 2009
In Paul Antle and Renee Marquis-Antle Spousal Trust v. The Queen, the Tax Court considered a series of transactions implemented by a Canadian resident taxpayer known as a “capital property step-up strategy”
Crown appeals General Electric case
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- March 18 2010
On January 4, 2010, the Crown deposited with the Federal Court of Appeal its notice of appeal of the Tax Court of Canada's judgment in the case of General Electric Capital Canada Inc
Tax court finds unanimous shareholders’ agreement affected legal control of a corporation its non-resident shareholders
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- June 5 2012
Determining who controls a corporation is relevant to determining the availability of certain tax benefits provided by the Income Tax Act (Canada
Employee stock option surrender payments non-deductible
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- February 11 2011
On December 21, 2010, the Tax Court of Canada dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal in Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited v. The Queen
Central management and control determines trust residence
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- September 23 2009
In Garron, M. et al. v. The Queen, the Tax Court of Canada considered whether two Barbados trusts (the “Trusts”) were entitled to claim the benefit of the capital gains exemption in Article XIV(4) of the Canada-Barbados Income Tax Convention (the “Treaty”) on their dispositions to an arm’s length purchaser of shares of two Canadian holding corporations which indirectly owned a Canadian automotive parts manufacturing and assembly business
Arm’s length principle interpreted by Canadian court
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- December 8 2009
On December 4, 2009, the long awaited decision in General Electric Capital Canada Inc. v. The Queen was released by Canada's Tax Court
Money lender’s doubtful and bad debt claims on “extraordinary” loan disallowed
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- November 30 2009
In Heron Bay Investments Ltd. v. The Queen, the Tax Court considered whether a $3.77 million non-recourse demand loan made in 1994 by Heron Bay to another corporate group member met the criteria for deductibility under the Income Tax Act (Canada) as either a doubtful debt or a bad debt in Heron Bay’s 1995 taxation year
Canada’s Supreme Court to hear GAAR appeal
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- February 9 2010
The concept of paid-up capital is important for Canadian tax purposes in that, unlike certain of its treaty partners, Canada permits corporations to return capital to shareholders (even if they have accumulated earnings and profits for tax purposes), without payment of Canadian non-resident withholding tax
Stripped interest coupon planning not subject to GAAR
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- May 19 2010
On May 17, 2010, the Federal Court of Appeal allowed the taxpayer’s appeal in Lehigh Cement Limited v. The Queen, holding that the general anti-avoidance rule (“GAAR”) did not apply to a series of transactions through which Lehigh’s interest payments on debt held by a related non-resident corporation were paid free of withholding tax to an arm’s length non-resident bank
Current Search
Suggested Facets
Author
- Douglas J. Powrie (1)
- Elinore J. Richardson (8)
- Larissa Tkachenko (1)
- Natasha Miklaucic (2)
- Pamela Cross (1)
- Stephen Fyfe (1)
