We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 101

Are pre-contractual representations “continuing”? Even if the contracting parties change?

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada, United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 18 2014

Circumstances change and what is true today may not be true tomorrow. For that reason, some representations carry with them the obligation to advise

Variation of leases - the dangers of not including the guarantor

  • Pitmans LLP
  • -
  • Canada, United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 10 2014

The recent Court of Appeal decision, Topland Portfolio No.1 Limited v Smiths News Trading Limited 2014 EWCA Civ 18, has provided a reminder to

This week in securities litigation (week ending February 28, 2014)

  • Dorsey & Whitney LLP
  • -
  • Canada, Hong Kong, Japan, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • February 27 2014

The Supreme Court handed down a significant decision, construing SLUSA in the context of suits by investors defrauded investors in the Stanford Ponzi

Costs sanctions for failing to respond to an offer to mediate: a warning to litigants in the UK

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • Canada, United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 19 2014

A recent UK Court of Appeal judgment demonstrates a clear and unequivocal endorsement of mediation and makes clear that a party who refuses to

High Court strikes out libel claim brought after YouTube video removed

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • Canada, United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 13 2014

In the case of Jackson v Universal Music Operations Ltd (2014), following an application for summary judgment, the High Court struck out the libel

Guarantor pays nothing in DIY store case

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • Canada, United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 11 2014

The recent Court of Appeal case involving Topland Limited and Smiths News Trading Limited was a salutary lesson about the strict rules that protect

Case note: Risalsdar v Ali, 2014 ONCA 59

  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • -
  • Canada, United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 3 2014

The Respondents, who were due funds, entered into a settlement agreement with the appellants who claimed to have limited funds to satisfy the debt

High Court upholds restrictive covenants

  • Faegre Baker Daniels
  • -
  • Canada, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • January 31 2014

In East of England Schools CIC (trading as 4myschools) v Palmer & Another 2013 EWHC 4138, the High Court considered the enforceability of the

Euroresource--deals and debt (January 2014)

  • Jones Day
  • -
  • Canada, European Union, Spain, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • January 31 2014

In Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd., No. 12-842, 2014 BL 7274 (Jan. 10, 2014), the Supreme Court granted a petition for a writ of certiorari to hear an

Litigation privilege

  • Burges Salmon LLP
  • -
  • Canada, United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 28 2014

We have written about legal privilege before and while it sounds like something which could only interest a lawyer, the consequences for clients of