We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 918

When is a little knowledge a dangerous thing? When it is used to disqualify in-house counsel

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 28 2014

A powerful tool in the litigation arsenal is the bringing of a motion to remove counsel from a file, either because she possesses disqualifying

Allowing Ontario’s privacy tort to develop in the health information sphere for now

  • Dentons
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 2 2014

In the 1980's the Supreme Court of Canada pre-emptively ended the development of a common law tort of discrimination. The case, Seneca College v

In-house counsel properly disqualified; but noa not invalidated as a result

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 5 2014

This was an appeal by Valeant Canada LPValeant Canada S.E.C. And Valeant International Bermuda (collectively “Valeant”) and cross-appeal by Cobalt

Federal Court dismisses application for a prohibition order in respect of PATADAY eye drop solution

  • Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 18 2014

This case concerns a proposed generic version of the brand name drug PATADAY, an eye drop solution used to treat allergic and inflammatory eye

Updating the plant breeder’s rights regime in Canada

  • Miller Thomson LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 3 2014

Development of a new seed variety requires a substantial investment of time and money. The quest to discover new traits and improve plant performance

Product specificity requirement trumps patent construction for listing

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 5 2014

Lilly sought to list Canadian Patent No. 2,379,329 on the patent register for their product TRIFEXIS. The Minister refused, stating that the patent

Plaintiff’s right to videorecord independent medical examinations andor to have a nominee present

  • Field Law
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 21 2013

The plaintiff sued for personal injury as a result of a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 14 November, 2007. The plaintiff alleged injuries to

Chatham Kent (Municipality) v. National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW Canada), Local 127 (Clarke Grievance), 2007 O.L.A.A. No. 135 (“Chatham Kent”)

  • Dentons
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 11 2011

In ChathamKent, the employer terminated the employment of Jessica Clarke ("Clarke") for breach of the confidentiality agreement, insubordination, and conduct unbefitting a personal caregiver at the home for the aged where she worked

Methods of medical treatment and dosage claims

  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • June 28 2011

In Canada, claims to methods of medical treatment are considered to fall outside the definition of invention according to section 2 of the Patent Act and a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada

Supreme Court of Canada upholds ban on private label drugs

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • January 22 2014

On November 22, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously upheld Ontario's ban on the sale of private label generic drugs by pharmacy chains. In