We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-7 of 7

‘Confidential’ means what it says

  • Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • June 19 2009

The Ontario court recently issued an injunction to stop Rusoro Mining Ltd from continuing with a hostile bid for Gold Reserve Inc

Non-compete agreement in purchase and sale or employment agreement?

  • Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 22 2012

When employers are buying other businesses, the question of non-competes often arises

B.C. First Nations’ challenge to the ratification of an investment agreement with China dismissed

  • Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 24 2013

On August 26, 2013, in Hupacasath First Nation v. Minister of Foreign Affairs, 2013 FC 900, the Federal Court of Canada dismissed the application of

Tax Court of Canada renders decision on taxation of break fees

  • Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 24 2012

On February 24, 2012, the Tax Court of Canada ("TCC") rendered its decision in Morguard Corporation v. Her Majesty the Queen (2012 TCC 55 PDF) on the issue of the taxation of break fees received in the context of a takeover bid pursuant to a "lock-up agreement"

Canada’s Federal Court of Appeal provides guidance on contested mergers

  • Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 28 2013

For the first time in a decade, an appellate court has considered a contested merger in Canada. On February 25, 2013, the Federal Court of Appeal

Fasken Martineau comments on the Supreme Court's decision regarding BCE Inc.

  • Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • June 20 2008

Today, the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously overturned the Quebec Court of Appeal’s decision which had threatened to derail the acquisition of BCE Inc., the largest leveraged buy-out transaction in Canadian history

Fair to whom? The Quebec Court Of Appeal's decision in the matter of the proposed arrangement concerning BCE Inc

  • Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • June 17 2008

On May 21, 2008, the Quebec Court of Appeal ruled in favour of a group of debentureholders of Bell Canada Inc. (“Bell Canada”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of BCE Inc. (“BCE”), which had challenged the proposed acquisition of BCE through a plan of arrangement by a consortium led by Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board