Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-4 of 4
Recent developments for the fourth quarter 2011
- Baker & McKenzie
- -
- Canada, China, Denmark, European Union, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Switzerland, United Kingdom, USA
- -
- March 15 2012
The end of the year and beginning of a new year is always a busy time for us, as it is for most of our clients
Can an arbitration clause survive encroachment from European law?
- Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
- -
- Canada, European Union
- -
- June 8 2011
Mr. Justice Tugendhat in the recent case of Accentuate Ltd v Asigra Inc 2009 EWHC 2655 (QB), held that a claimant had a good arguable case that a Canadian arbitration and jurisdiction clause, was not enforceable because that clause would result in EU Regulations not being taken into account
European Court of Justice rules that no privilege attaches to communications with in-house counsel in European Commission’s competition investigations
- McCarthy Tétrault LLP
- -
- Canada, European Union
- -
- January 12 2011
On September 14, 2010, the European Court of Justice, Europe's highest court, ruled that communications between a company and its in-house lawyers are not covered by legal professional privilege (i.e., solicitor-client privilege in Canada) when the company comes under investigation by the European Union competition authorities
In-house counsel’s legal advice is not privileged under European Union law
- Torys LLP
- -
- Canada, European Union
- -
- September 24 2010
The European Court of Justice has issued a major decision on the limits of privilege in the European Union (EU
