We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

UK Supreme Court decides it’s okay to look

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada, European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 19 2013

Is there a difference between having a collection of headlines assembled in a report and sent to you by email versus viewing that same report on a

What is a "sculpture" for copyright purposes? Can an action be brought for the infringement of a foreign copyright?

  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • Canada, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • September 21 2011

In an article published in March 2010, we commented on a decision of the English Court of Appeal which considered the meaning of the term "sculpture" in a copyright context as well as a conflict of law issue

The royal business of cakes

  • Heenan Blaikie LLP
  • -
  • Canada, United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 2 2011

The Royal Wedding cake contains several layers of Intellectual Property (IP) protection

MediaCAT scratches the Norwich Pharmacal Order

  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • -
  • Canada, United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 8 2011

In MediaCAT v Adam et al, His Honour Judge Birss considered the appropriateness of the Norwich Pharmacal Order and when it should be used, as he noted that there is a potential difficulty with the Norwich Pharmacal process: In short the judge was concerned about the lack of safeguards on the use of information obtained under these orders

Technical protection measures

  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • Canada, United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 30 2010

A recent decision of the High Court of Justice of England illustrates how copyright legislation dealing with technical protection measures ("TPMs") can be applied

UK ruling - internet jurisdiction based on server location?

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • Canada, United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 30 2010

Recently, a court in the UK (Football Dataco Ltd et al. v. Sportradar GmbH) found that the location of a server determined the appropriate jurisdiction to regulate internet content