We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 345

Public procurement: the “normal average tenderer”

  • Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 13 2014

Typically in a procurement challenge, a court has to determine whether the invitation to tender is sufficiently clear to enable tenderers to

Procurement challenges two bites at the cherry?

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 11 2014

Under UK law, generally, a procurement challenge can only be brought if it is made within 30 days of the date the claimant first had knowledge (or

The "objective reasonable tenderer" stands supreme after more than 4 years and 3 court decisions (procurement Healthcare at Home case)

  • MacRoberts LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 1 2014

The Supreme Court issued its judgement yesterday in the Healthcare at Home case. The judgement takes a pleasantly entertaining canter through use of

Court of Appeal upholds TCC decision on indemnity

  • Bond Dickinson LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 24 2014

In Greenwich Millennium Village Limited v Essex Services Group PLC & Others, the Court of Appeal considered an indemnity clause in circumstances

Procurement pulse - June 2014

  • DLA Piper LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 14 2014

Word from Cabinet Office is that a consultation paperdraft legislation on implementation of the new procurement directives will be issued over the

Viking windfarm Court of Session reverses quashing of section 36 consent

  • MacRoberts LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 11 2014

On 9 July the Inner House of the Court of Session upheld the Scottish Minister's decision to grant section 36 consent for the construction and

Preservation of legal privilege in corporate investigations a cross border comparison

  • Dechert LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • July 11 2014

A D.C. Circuit decision (In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.) has confirmed privilege over employee statements during in-house investigations. Can the

Valuing variations: ponder on your omissions

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 7 2014

The Court of Appeal has recently upheld a TCC decision last year in MT Hojgaard v E.ON providing an important reminder as to how to approach the

Asset modelling to curb PFI disputes?

  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 3 2014

In May 2011, the government published its Government Construction Strategy which called for 'a profound change in the relationship between public

Terminating a FIDIC contract: what’s in a notice?

  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 2 2014

Notices serve many important functions on construction projects. They are the means by which employers (usually acting through a contract