We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 363

Eurocom Ltd v Siemens PLC - 2014 EWHC 3710 (TCC), Mr Justice Ramsey

  • Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 30 2014

Under a sub-contract dated 20 April 2011 (‘the Sub-Contract’) Siemens PLC (‘Siemens’) engaged Eurocom Ltd (‘Eurocom’) to install communications

Commercial contracts - November 2014

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 28 2014

The Legal Writings (Counterparts and Delivery) (Scotland) Bill (the Bill) promises two significant improvements to the execution of legal documents

Liquidated damages provisions in jeopardy: an unexpected consequence of amending the contract

  • Holman Fenwick Willan LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 25 2014

When a contract price is lowered by agreement between the parties, this may have an unexpected effect on the enforceability of any liquidated damages

Why American Cyanamid is the Bruce Forsythe of case law

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 19 2014

To any litigator, American Cyanamid is not just “one of America’s top manufacturing companies during the 1970s” (it says in Wikipedia) but the case

Should I stay or should I go? (revisited) further automatic suspension upheld

  • Burges Salmon LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 13 2014

Further to our recent briefing of October 2014 Should I Stay or Should I Go?, the English High Court has stayed another contract award perhaps

Procurement challenges - should I stay or should I go?

  • Burges Salmon LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 31 2014

Not the famous song by the Clash but the choice facing claimant bidders and the Courts in procurement challenges. Two English judgments reported in

Court of Session casts some light on the Public Contracts (Scotland) Regulations 2012: Street Lighting Supplies & Co Ltd v Scotland Excel and Renfrewshire Council

  • MacRoberts LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 28 2014

In March 2014, Scotland Excel, a body formed by agreement between all 32 local authorities in Scotland, advertised a procurement exercise in relation

When do liquidated damages become unenforceable?

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 23 2014

A recent case Unaoil Ltd v Leighton Offshore Pte Ltd relating to a memorandum of agreement for a potential services contract illustrates that a

A recent procurement case

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 20 2014

Willmott Dixon Partnership Ltd v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham 9 October 2014 is a useful reminder of a number of general principles

Termination for convenience clauses: an alternative view from the TCC

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 20 2014

We reported recently on a Commercial Court decision which held that termination for convenience clauses operate to place a limit on claims for loss