We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 499

Consequences of misunderstanding client instructions

  • Bond Dickinson LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 25 2014

The High Court recently ruled in Wellesley Partners LLP v Withers LLP 2014 EWHC 556 (Ch) that Withers pay £1.6m in damages to Wellesley for an

Case update: The Queen on the application of Ellen Mafico v nursing and Midwifery Council 2014 EWHC 363

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 11 2014

High Court dismiss nurse's appeal on the basis that any legal misdirection by the legal assessor was not of sufficient importance to invalidate the

Case update: White v Nursing and Midwifery Council and Turner v Nursing and Midwifery Council 2014 EWHC 520 (Admin)

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 11 2014

This highly anticipated judgment from the High Court on the admissibility of anonymous hearsay evidence in professional disciplinary proceedings

Case update: The Queen on the Application of John Grabinar v General Medical Council 2013 EWHC 4480 (Admin)

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 11 2014

High Court quashes decision made by the Assistant Registrar of the General Medical Council on a case proceeding outside the five-year time limit and

First UK prosecutions for FGM

  • Bolt Burdon Kemp
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 24 2014

The Crown Prosecution Service has announced the first prosecutions over female genital mutilation (FGM) in the UK. Dr Dhanuson Dharmasena will be

Is winning on a legal technicality in the interests of justice?

  • Anthony Gold Solicitors
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 10 2014

The recent decision of the Court of Appeal to limit the legal costs in Andrew Mitchell MP's defamation case against The Sun will have widespread

Hicks v Russell Jones & Walker duty to consult leading counsel over evidence

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 12 2007

The claimant and his wife were directors of a company which owned a hotel

Solicitors’ advice should not be too bullish

  • Nabarro LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 24 2010

The Court of Appeal recently reminded both solicitors and clients about the standard of care that a client is entitled to expect from its legal advisers

R (on the application of CokeWallis) v ICAEW

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 25 2011

On 19 January 2011 in a unanimous decision the Supreme Court upheld an appeal by Mr Coke-Wallis, a chartered accountant and ICAEW member, against a decision of the Institute to exclude him from membership

Will limitation ever be easy?

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 17 2010

Limitation in professional negligence cases has always been difficult, but especially so after the decision of the House of Lords in Law Society v Sephton