Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-8 of 8
Lender awarded indemnity costs after successfully defending PPI claim
- Wragge & Co LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- August 20 2012
Black Horse Limited has once again, successfully defended a varied array of payment protection insurance (PPI) mis-selling claims in the Liverpool County Court
Another victory for lenders on PPI
- Wragge & Co LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- May 30 2012
In the case of McCrossan & Gould v Black Horse Ltd the borrowers had taken out a loan for £16,000 from the lender in order to pay existing debts owed to various creditors
Rules are rules, chaps: not disclosing commission on a PPI sale was not unfair
- Wragge & Co LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- October 14 2011
In 2006, Mr and Mrs Harrison (the borrowers) obtained a loan from the lender and were sold associated payment protection insurance (PPI) at the same time
Courts continue to find in lenders' favour on PPI mis-selling claims
- Wragge & Co LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- December 20 2010
Wragge & Co works closely with a number of lenders including Black Horse who are currently faced with high volumes of payment protection insurance (PPI) mis-selling and Consumer Credit Act (CCA) enforceability claims brought against them by claims management companies and fuelled by conditional fee agreements and after-the-event insurance policies
Borrowers 0 lenders 3
- Wragge & Co LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- August 11 2010
There have been three judgments dealing with Consumer Credit Act test cases that lenders need to be aware of
Court hands down judgment on key issues under the Consumer Credit Act 1974: Carey v HSBC
- Wragge & Co LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- January 8 2010
The High Court has handed down an important judgment in the case of Carey v HSBC Bank Plc
Court of Appeal delivers judgment on meaning of multiple agreements under the Consumer Credit Act 1974
- Wragge & Co LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- November 6 2009
In our alert Meaning of multiple agreements under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, we reported on the High Court decision of HHJ Purle QC in Heath v- Southern Pacific Mortgage Limited
Does non-compliance with section 77(1) extinguish a creditor's rights? Phillip McGuffick -v- The Royal Bank of Scotland plc
- Wragge & Co LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- October 12 2009
In October 2005, the debtor entered into a fixed-sum regulated loan agreement with the defendant bank under which the debtor borrowed a sum of money
