Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 48

Levy v Solicitors Regulation Authority 2011 EWHC 740 (admin)

Kingsley Napley
-
United Kingdom
-
June 1 2011

The appellant solicitor, Mr Levy, appealed the decision of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) to suspend him for nine months and impose a £26,000 fine

Solicitors Regulation Authority v Dennison 2011 ALL ER (D) 320 (MAR)

Kingsley Napley
-
United Kingdom
-
June 1 2011

D was an equity partner in a firm of solicitors (‘the Firm’

General Dental Council v Rimmer 2011 EWHC 3438 (Admin).

Kingsley Napley
-
United Kingdom
-
January 16 2012

Mr Rimmer, an experienced dental practitioner, had between 2003 and 2006 administered intravenous polypharmacy sedation to fifteen child patients, to enable him to carry out dental procedures on them

E-regulator: Holmes v Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons 2011 UKPC 48

Kingsley Napley
-
United Kingdom
-
January 16 2012

Mr Holmes was a veterinary surgeon

Lutton v General Dental Council Court of Session

Kingsley Napley
-
United Kingdom
-
October 13 2011

When issuing a warning letter, that warning must convey to its recipient why it was considered necessary and why any factual dispute has been resolved against the practitioner

E-regulator: case commentary: Belal v General Medical Council 2011 EWHC 2859 (Admin)

Kingsley Napley
-
United Kingdom
-
December 2 2011

Dr Belal was a General Practitioner

Levinge v Health Professions Council 2012 EWHC 135 (Admin)

Kingsley Napley
-
United Kingdom
-
March 1 2012

In a case originally presented by Kingsley Napley, the principle set out in Southall v the General Medical Council 2010 EWCA Civ 407 was considered alongside the reasoning given by the Panel for dismissing expert evidence when making their decision

McCarthy v Bar Standards Board, Visitors to the Inns of Court, 25 January 2012

Kingsley Napley
-
United Kingdom
-
March 1 2012

Rule 7(1)(a) of the Disciplinary Hearing Rules requiring evidence to be served does include statements of witnesses and the withholding of statements to prevent a registrant ‘tempering’ his evidence around the statement is ‘unacceptable’

Case update: Patel v General Medical Council 2012 EWHC 3688

Kingsley Napley
-
United Kingdom
-
January 4 2013

The Applicant (A), a 73 year old general practitioner, made an application to the court to exercise its power under s41A(10) to terminate an Interim Order