We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 649

IP snapshot July 2014

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 31 2014

The UK IPO referred a claim to the IPEC on 23 October 2013, directing that it would be more properly dealt with by the court. In the proceedings, the

A summary of major developments in key areas - general counsel update - July 2014

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, European Union, Hong Kong, United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 15 2014

Legislation, in the form of a Regulation and Directive, has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union which will substantially

Technology newsletter - Case Summaries

  • Rouse Legal
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 15 2014

Earlier this year Lush won a big victory against Amazon when the High Court found that it had infringed Lush’s trade marks. But many wondered what

The ABCD of interim injunctions and the adequacy of damages

  • Penningtons Manches LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 10 2014

One of the strengths of English law is the ability for parties to identify, allocate and cap risks by agreeing limitations on the levels of damage or

Litigation and protecting industrial secrets from disclosure

  • Eversheds LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 8 2014

The recent High Court judgment in Smith & Nephew Plc v Convatec Technologies Inc 2014 EWHC 146 is a timely reminder of the steps that can be taken

Are commissioned advertising photographs exclusive to the client? Orvec International Ltd v Linfoots Ltd

  • Swan Turton LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 3 2014

Not always, according to a recent judgment in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC). His Honour Judge Hacon found that product shots of

Keeping it confidential: pursuing litigation where industrial secrets are at risk of disclosure

  • Eversheds LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 1 2014

The recent case of Smith & Nephew Plc v Convatec Technologies Inc 2014 EWHC 146involved an application for a permanent order prohibiting the use

IP snapshot June 2014

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 30 2014

Environmental Defence Systems brought an action against Synergy for patent infringement, in which they claimed that there was no inventive step in

IPEC refuses to disregard costs cap despite forged letter from “Judge”

  • Burges Salmon LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 2 2014

The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court ("IPEC") has a fixed costs system and must adhere to scale costs and a £50,000 costs cap (CPR 45.30 and

IP snapshot - May 2014

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 30 2014

The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court that a patent for a buggy was obvious over a Chinese utility