We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 24,219

Network interference - a legal guide to the commercial risks and rewards of the social media phenomenon

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Global, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • April 22 2014

Social media is a revolution in the way in which corporations communicate with consumers. This White Paper will help you to maximise the huge

The dangers of ‘non-binding’ Memoranda of Agreements

  • Burges Salmon LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 16 2014

Heads of Terms' or 'Memoranda of Agreement' ("MoA") are commonly agreed by parties as a precursor to entering into more substantial agreements. MoA

Cross-border investigations update

  • Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP
  • -
  • China, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • October 14 2014

The inaugural edition of Cross-Border Investigations Update includes an overview of enforcement trends, including the increasing cooperation between U

Employees beware email usage in the workplace

  • Mason Hayes & Curran
  • -
  • Ireland, United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 9 2014

The UK Employment Appeals Tribunal (the "EAT") has held that the use of emails by an employer discovered in the course of an employee disciplinary

It might not be right, but was it reasonable?

  • Penningtons Manches LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 16 2014

Every few years the wider legal community has to be reminded of the employer friendly test of misconduct that applies in employment law. Employment

Buyer beware! TUPE may apply in your share purchase

  • Taylor Wessing
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 15 2014

When we hear the words "share purchase" we normally breathe a sigh of relief - TUPE will not apply. It is true that in the context of a purchase of

Litigation funders ordered to pay indemnity costs

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 24 2014

A High Court decision handed down yesterday (23 October) has significant implications both for third parties who fund litigation on commercial terms

Tribunal rules employee did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in regard to his work emails

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • Ireland, United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 14 2014

In Atkinson v Community Gateway Association UKEAT045712, the UK EAT held that accessing an employee's emails, in the course of a disciplinary

The extent of any duty to advise in a non-advisory role

  • Bond Dickinson LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 16 2014

The recent decision of Crestsign Ltd v National Westminster Bank Plc and another 2014 EWHC 3043 (Ch) provides a useful illustration of how advisory

IPR, EPO opposition and UK litigation

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • October 9 2014

We report here on what appears to be one of the first IPR cases to have corresponding validity challenges in other jurisdictions, namely Europe at