We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,895

Market abuse update April 2015

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, European Union, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • April 16 2015

2014 was marked by record fines for benchmarkmManipulation globally, criminal prosecutions for insider trading and market manipulation, and the first

A cautionary Tael Supreme Court decision on LMA secondary trade documents Tael One Partners Limited v Morgan Stanley co international plc

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 16 2015

The Tael case concerns LMA secondary trading documentation, and specifically the allocation of a payment premium between the buyer and seller. After

English Commercial Court rules that an unsigned agreement can still bind the parties

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 14 2015

The English Commercial Court has ruled that a party had accepted the terms of an agreement by its conduct, even though it had not signed the

An unsigned agreement can still bind the parties

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 10 2015

The Commercial Court has ruled that a party had accepted the terms of an agreement by its conduct, even though it had not signed the agreement and

Dangers of filing further acknowledgement of service when appealing jurisdiction judgment

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 9 2015

The Court of Appeal has held that filing a further acknowledgement of service following an unsuccessful jurisdiction challenge amounts to submission

The need to act strategically to preserve state immunity: states lose immunity by taking steps in proceedings in the English Courts to challenge a tribunal’s jurisdiction

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 9 2015

In an appeal in a case considering the interrelation between arbitration and state immunity, on an application by France and Spain (the States), the

UK: duty to make reasonable adjustments: employers not fixed with constructive knowledge of disability provided took reasonable steps to investigate

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 8 2015

An employer's failure to investigate discrepancies in an occupational health report (which found no disability) will not necessarily fix it with

UK: harassment: potential liability for damages to indirect victim

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 8 2015

An employer could be vicariously liable under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 for harm caused by an employee harassing a colleague, including

UK: disability: Type 2 diabetes controlled by abstention from sugary drinks is not disability, according to EAT

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 8 2015

Type 2 diabetes is not necessarily a disability for employment purposes, according to the EAT. A claimant did not satisfy the definition of

백투백(back-to-back) 하도급계약의 분쟁해결조항

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 7 2015

최근 영국 법원이 판결을 내린 Imtech Inviron Ltd v Loppingdale Plant Ltd 사건은 백투백 계약서를 작성하는 데 있어 단순히 "참조" 방식을 사용하는 것에 따르는 위험에 대하여 다시 생각해보는 계기를 제공합니다. 배경 본 사건은