We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,655

SPCs for biologics guidance on product definitions, scope and validity from EFTA court

  • Carpmaels & Ransford LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 22 2015

The EU Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC) Regulation (4692006) has been the subject of extensive analysis and numerous referrals to the

Litigation: proportionate costs order

  • Eversheds LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 22 2015

A proportionate cost order has been awarded in the High Court despite the claimant beating the Part 36 offer and recovering 100 of damages

The Court of Appeal allows regulator’s appeal and overturns High Court decision to extend the time limit for the Registrant to issue an appeal

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 20 2015

The Registrant sought to appeal against the NMC’s Conduct and Competence Committee (CCC) finding that her fitness to practise was impaired and their

GMC appeal - is dishonesty less serious if the motive andor gain is not immediately apparent?

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 17 2015

Dr A lodged an appeal against a decision of the Fitness to Practise Panel (the Panel) of the Medical Practitioners’ Tribunal Service of the GMC

New case law on consent considered in recent Hill Dickinson case

  • Hill Dickinson LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 17 2015

Gill Stoll gives details of a recent judgment handed down by the designated civil judge for Liverpool, His Honour Judge Graham Wood QC in the

Not ‘out of sight, out of mind’: liability for employees working away from your organisation

  • Hill Dickinson LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 16 2015

It is a common misconception that, if an employee is contracted to work away from your premises, your duty for maintaining that person's welfare is

Patients must be warned of any ‘material risk’ of a procedure and advised of any reasonable alternatives

  • Hill Dickinson LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 16 2015

On 11 March 2015, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of Montgomery -v- Lanarkshire Health Board and has clarified the law in relation

Claimant’s costs bill struck out in the absence of satisfactory evidence of a valid retainer

  • Hill Dickinson LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 16 2015

Richard Hackett reviews the recently reported case of Scott -v- Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust in which a costs claim was struck out

The patent review 2013 - 2014: remedies - a novel approach

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 15 2015

Following the approach taken by the Judge at the hearing of Warner-Lambert's previous application for a mandatory interim injunction against Actavis

UK High Court gives useful recap on liability for stress-induced psychiatric illness in the workplace (part 2)

  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 14 2015

In Part 1 of this piece we considered the requirement of foreseeability as a condition of establishing an employer’s liability for stress-related