We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 37

Exclusion clauses part 2: recent developments

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 15 2009

This is the second of a two part series on exclusion clauses in English law

Rome II - conflict

  • RPC
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 29 2007

The long awaited and much debated Rome II Regulation was finally published in July

Changing online terms without notifying customers is a risky business

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • October 8 2007

A recent US court ruling is a harsh reminder that unless customers are given sufficient notice of changes to online contracts (eg, subscriptions, website terms of use, conditions of sale) the changes will not be binding

OFT to investigate how businesses advertise and price goods and services

  • Squire Sanders
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 28 2009

The OFT has announced that it intends to investigate how businesses advertise and price their goods and services both online and offline

Why all the type on the bottom of business messages can be a blessing, not a burden

  • Wedlake Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 25 2009

Many businesses have clear guidelines about the type of things that their staff should leave out of work e-mails, without realising that they also need to pay attention to what is included

OFT cuts to the core of Apple's terms of business

  • MacRoberts LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 7 2009

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has announced that Apple Inc, the software and hardware giant, has agreed to change its contractual terms and conditions to make them fairer for consumers

Correspondence or contract?

  • MacRoberts LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 29 2009

The recent Court of Session case of Baillie Estates Limited v. Du Pont (UK) Limited, decided in June 2009, highlights the danger of negotiating a contract by email

Immortal souls and standard form agreements: reminders after April Fools’ prank

  • McMillan LLP
  • -
  • Canada, United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 11 2010

The purpose of a written agreement is to serve as evidence of the bargain reached between two or more parties, and it should always be carefully crafted to properly reflect their objectives

Distance Selling Regulations - do you know your obligations?

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 16 2010

The Distance Selling Regulations have been in force for almost 10 years, yet businesses are still failing to understand and fulfil their obligations under these Regulations

Consumers that cancel distance contracts to be reimbursed initial delivery costs

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 13 2010

The ECJ has confirmed that consumers should be reimbursed for any initial delivery costs on cancellation of a distance contract