We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 101

Steamship appeal dismissed

  • Taylor Wessing
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 20 2015

The Court of Appeal was asked to consider the characterisation of claims, state immunity and the arbitrability of claims between a protection and

International quarterly - issue 13, 2014

  • Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 14 2015

A party may apply to the English court to remove an arbitrator on the grounds that circumstances exist that give rise to justifiable

The Front Comor: an end to anti-suit injunctions?

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Italy, United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 31 2008

The Advocate General of the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) has now delivered her opinion on a question referred to the ECJ by the House of Lords earlier this year in the case of the “Front Comor” concerning the use of anti-suit injunctions by the English Courts

Shipping Sector Update: Sulamerica CIA Nacional de Seguros SA and others v Enesa Engenharia SA and others 2012 EWCA Civ 638

  • Eversheds LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 13 2013

The dispute arose in connection with two construction all risk insurance policies between the appellant Enesa (“Insured”) and the respondent

General counsel update September 2014

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, China, European Union, Hong Kong, Russia, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • September 29 2014

The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) Court's new rules come into force on 1 October 2014 and are to apply to any arbitration

A summary of major developments in key areas - general counsel update - July 2014

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, European Union, Hong Kong, United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 15 2014

Legislation, in the form of a Regulation and Directive, has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union which will substantially

Where an insurance policy provides for arbitration within a certain time limit, does the expiry of this time limit terminate the right to bring a claim under the policy?

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 3 2010

In (1) William McIlroy Swindon Ltd (2) Rannoch Investments Ltd v Quinn Insurance Ltd 2010 EWHC 2488 (TCC), the Court considered preliminary issues in two claims brought against an insurer under the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 1930

Insurer escapes third-party claim

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 23 2010

In McIlroy & Rannoch v Quinn 2010 EWHC 2448 (TCC) the Technology and Construction Court held that a clause in an insurance policy which required arbitration to be launched within nine months was effective to bar a third-party's claim

High Court refuses stay in favour of arguable arbitration clause

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 8 2010

In the case of Noble Denton Middle East and Another v Noble Denton International Limited 2010 EWHC 2574, Mr Justice Burton was asked to decide two points

Shipping bulletin January 2012

  • Stephenson Harwood LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 16 2012

Charter on an amended NYPE 1946 form provided that all cargo claims to be settled as per ICA 96