We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 12

International mediation guide

  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • -
  • Belgium, Brazil, China, Czech Republic, European Union, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Morocco, Netherlands, Poland, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, Turkey, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • March 27 2013

We have compiled this Mediation Guide with a view to providing a better understanding Of the differences between jurisdictions in respect of

UK Government announces proposals for an “opt-out” collective competition damages action

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 7 2013

On 29 January 2013, the UK Government's Department for Business, Innovation & Skills announced new proposals designed to improve the ability for

Updates on international pricing issues for pharmaceutical and biologic products

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • China, European Union, France, Germany, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • May 18 2012

Sidley Austin LLP’s Global Life Sciences Team is pleased to provide you with this Global Pricing Newsletter, the first in a periodic series updating clients and friends of the firm on pricing issues around the world that may have an impact on pharmaceutical and biologic manufacturers’ legal and business strategies

London says “no” and Paris says “oui” on enforcement: contrasting the English and French court decisions in Dalla v. Pakistan

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • France, United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 19 2011

Without effective enforcement, international arbitration can be pointless

London says “No” and Paris says “Oui” on enforcement: contrasting the English and French court decisions in Dallah v. Pakistan

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • France, United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 16 2011

Without effective enforcement, international arbitration can be pointless

Arbitrage : la theorie du consentement implicite, plus que jamais

  • BOPS (SCP Bouckaert Ormen Passemard Sportes)
  • -
  • France, United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 30 2011

Le consentement à la clause compromissoire peut être implicite

Enforcement: London says “no” and Paris says “oui”

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • France, United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 21 2011

Dallah had sought to enforce its final arbitration award against the Pakistani Government in England but the High Court refused enforcement on the ground that the Government was not a party to the arbitration agreement

Dallah v Pakistan - French courts uphold the award

  • Chadbourne & Parke LLP
  • -
  • France, United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 25 2011

The Christmas edition of the Arbiter came with a stocking filler: our note discussing the decision of the English Supreme Court in Dallah v Pakistan (as published by the Practical Law Company

Court of Appeal upholds decision refusing enforcement of an ICC award

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • France, Pakistan, United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 5 2009

In Dallah Estate v Pakistan, the Court of Appeal confirmed a Commercial Court decision refusing enforcement of a French ICC award on the grounds that Pakistan was not party to the relevant arbitration agreement

London court awards Vivendi $2.41 billion in dispute over Polish wireless stake

  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • -
  • France, Poland, United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 27 2009

French media conglomerate Vivendi received a long-awaited boost in its effort to win back its stake in Polish wireless carrier Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa (PTC), as a tribunal associated with the London Court of International Arbitration ordered Elektrima Polish utility firm that once partnered with Vivendi in PTCto pay the French firm US $2.491 billion in damages and interest