We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

Privacy conscious Europe is leading the cloud computing charge

  • Dentons
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 28 2012

Lookout Canada and the U.S.: European regulators are working to give Europe a head-start as a safe jurisdiction for cloud computing

Privacy and data security

  • Dentons
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 6 2012

The official release of the draft of the European Commission’s proposed new European data protection law is expected in January 2012

European Commission wants the UK to strengthen ICO powers

  • Dentons
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 5 2010

The European Commission has requested that the UK Government increase the powers of the UK's data protection regulator, the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), or else face the threat of further legal action

Data protection: new cookies law a sting in the tail

  • Dentons
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 25 2009

The Council of the European Union has recently voted through tighter rules relating to the use of cookies

Privacy vs online behavioural advertising: is it legal?

  • Dentons
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 17 2009

Google recently announced that it has begun showing web surfers "interest-based ads"

New ECHR judgment: DNA database breaches human rights!

  • Dentons
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 23 2008

On 4 December 2008, the ECHR ruled that the UK Government's policy of retaining DNA samples of individuals suspected but then not convicted of a crime was a breach of the Article 8 right of respect for personal and family life that could not be justified on the grounds of the prevention of disorder or crime