We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 45

Access to leniency materials: Alstom appeals against European Commission decision to transmit documents to High Court of England and Wales

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 21 2012

On 9 June 2012, details were published of Alstom’s appeal against the Commission’s decision to transmit certain documents to the High Court of England and Wales

BAA’s right to appeal against forced sale: Court of Appeal grants BAA the opportunity to challenge fairness of Stansted sale

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 7 2012

On 28 May 2012, England’s Court of Appeal granted BAA permission to challenge its forced sale of Stansted airport

Ryanair’s right to appeal rejected: Supreme Court rejects Ryanair’s application for permission to appeal

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 7 2012

On 1 June 2012, the UK Supreme Court rejected Ryanair’s application to appeal the OFT’s judgment to proceed with a merger review into its 2006 purchase of a minority stake (29.82) in rival airline, Aer Lingus

Competition Appeal Tribunal orders on disclosure of information within confidentiality ring in Tesco appeal

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 8 2012

On 3 May 2012, the CAT published three orders in relation to the disclosure of information within a confidentiality ring in the context of an appeal brought by Tesco against the OFT’s decision to fine Tesco for its infringement of the Chapter I prohibition in relation to the retail pricing of cheese

CAT refuses BAA permission to appeal against CAT judgment on divestment of Stansted

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 13 2012

On 12 March 2012, the CAT published an order refusing BAA permission to appeal against the CAT’s judgment which had upheld the Competition Commission’s decision to require BAA to divest Stansted airport

Court of Appeal permits interclass to appeal against CAT decision on penalties

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 14 2012

On 8 February 2012, the Court of Appeal published an order allowing Interclass to appeal against the revised penalty imposed on it by the Competition Appeal Tribunal (“CAT”

Premier League copyright infringed but High Court calls time on anti-competitive contracts

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 8 2012

Following the recent landmark decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), the UK High Court has ruled that using decoder cards imported from other Member States to show live Premier League football matches in UK pubs constitutes a “communication to the public” and can give rise to copyright infringement of the “works” contained in those broadcasts

CAT upholds decision to require BAA to divest Stansted airport

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 7 2012

On 1 February 2012, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (“CAT”) ruled that the Competition Commission was entitled to require BAA to divest Stansted airport on the basis that the benefits of requiring BAA to do so outweighed the costs

High Court declares exclusive football broadcasting licences to be incompatible with Article 101

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 7 2012

On 3 February 2012, the High Court declared that obligations in an exclusive football broadcasting licence, which prohibited the supply of satellite decoder cards for use in the UK, were incompatible with Article 101

CAT quashes OFTdecision in tobacco cartel case

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 16 2011

On 12 December 2011, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (“CAT”) responded to appeals by Imperial Tobacco and five retailers against the decision of the Office of Fair Trading (“OFT”) in the Tobacco cartel case by quashing the OFT’s decision