We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 105

Court guidance on aggravated damages

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 10 2012

In Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Shaw, the EAT considered when aggravated damages should be awarded, and their relationship with awards for injury to feelings

Breach of undertakings in compromise agreement

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 28 2013

In Imman-Sadeque v BlueBay Asset Management (Services) Ltd, the High Court held that an employee who assisted a competitor whilst on garden leave

12 month non solicitation clause too long

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 10 2010

The High Court has ruled in Associated Foreign Exchange Ltd v International Foreign Exchange (UK) Ltd that Mr Abbassi, an account executive who had worked for AFEX and moved to a competitor, IFX , was not bound by a 12 month non solicitation of customers or potential customers clause

Retraction of dismissal only in exceptional cases

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 10 2010

In Willoughby v CF Capital plc the EAT found that an attempted retraction of a dismissal by CF Capital plc of Ms Willoughby following discussions with her about changing her employment status was not valid

Restrictive covenants in an unsigned contract

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 31 2013

The High Court has held in FW Farnsworth Ltd v Lacy that an employee was bound by the restrictive covenants contained in an updated contract of

Court of Appeal rules on compulsory retirement at 65

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 6 2010

In Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes and Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills the Court of Appeal upheld a tribunal decision that a law firm's rule that its partners should be compulsorily retired on reaching the age of 65 could be justified as a proportionate means of achieving legitimate aims

Constructive dismissal

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 1 2011

In Tullett Prebon plc v BGC Brokers LP the Court of Appeal considered the High Court's construction of issues relating to repudiatory breach and constructive dismissal and upheld its findings

Christian worker required to work on Sundays

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 4 2013

In Mba v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Merton, the EAT has considered whether a Christian care worker suffered indirect religious

Liability of administrators for acts of discrimination

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 1 2011

In another case involving administrators, an employment tribunal somewhat controversially has held that the individual administrators could be liable as principals in an agency relationship with employees of a company in administration

Rule against cornrows discriminatory

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 5 2011

In a case which has attracted much press attention, the High Court held in G v Head Teacher and Governors of St Gregory’s Catholic Science College that the school’s ban on boys wearing cornrow hairstyles (instituted to reduce the risk of gang culture and ethnic tensions) was indirectly discriminatory on the ground of race and could not be justified